Draft -- Great Britain; Great Britain -- Defenses; World War, 1914-1918
In the sixteenth century we fought Philip of of Spain to prevent him
from acquiring European predominance. In the seventeenth, eighteenth,
and nineteenth centuries we fought Louis XIV., Louis XV., and Napoleon
for the same reason. In order to preserve the balance of power, and
with it our own security, it was our interest under Elizabeth to
prevent the Netherlands from being crushed by Spain. Under later
monarchs it was our interest to prevent the Netherlands, the lesser
German States, Prussia, Austria, and finally the whole of Europe from
being crushed by France. And we can as ill afford to-day to allow
France to be crushed by Germany, or Holland and Belgium to fall into
her power. The wheel has come round full circle, but the essential
British interest remains constant.
The wheel is always turning, sometimes slowly, sometimes with startling
swiftness. Years hence the present alliances will probably be
discarded. It may be that some day the danger of a European
predominance will appear from a different quarter--from one of our
present allies, or from some upstart state which may rise to power with
an even greater rapidity than the Electorate of Brandenburg. Or it may
be that before long the New World, in fact as well as phrase, may have
come in to redress the balance of the Old. We cannot say, because we
cannot foresee what the future holds in store. But from the opening of
the present century, the immediate danger came from Germany, who hardly
troubled to conceal the fact that she was aiming at predominance by
mastery of the Low Countries and by crushing France.
{247}
[Sidenote: CONDITIONS OF BRITISH FREEDOM]
That this danger was from time to time regarded seriously by a section
of the British Cabinet, we know from their own statements both before
war broke out and subsequently. It was no chimera confined to the
imaginations of irresponsible and panic-stricken writers. In sober
truth the balance of power in Europe was in as much danger, and the
maintenance of it had become as supreme a British interest, under a
Liberal government at the beginning of the twentieth century, as it
ever was under a Whig government at the close of the seventeenth and
opening of the eighteenth.
The stealthy return of this doctrine into the region of practical
politics was not due to the prejudices of the party which happened to
be in power. Quite the contrary. Most Liberals distrusted the phrase.
The whole mass of the Radicals abhorred it. The idea which lay under
and behind the phrase was nevertheless irresistible, because it arose
out of the facts. Had a Socialist Government held office, this policy
must equally have imposed itself and been accepted with a good or ill
grace, for the simple reason that, unless the balance of power is
maintained in Europe, there can be no security for British freedom,
under which we mean, with God's help, to work out our own problems in
our own way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account