"No; they put us in the wrong and they keep us in the wrong, for
God's sake--so He shan't be vexed. They don't understand it isn't
only adultery that breaks up marriage, but a thousand other things
beside. It's human progress and education and understanding; and
these pious people only leave one door to escape through. And they
don't seem to see that to decent thinking and self-respecting men and
women that's a door they won't enter. They say, 'If you want to
right your mistake, you must sin.' But if Almighty God made
marriage, He never made such filth to be thrust down the throats of
them that fail in marriage. Thus, any way, it stands with Minnie
Courtier at present--and with me. This is the law and clear enough.
A man disappears and blots himself out of life, you may say, and,
what's more important, blots himself out of the lives of everybody
who knew him, including his wife. And the question is, what can the
wife do about it? I've looked into this very close, and I find the
issue is like a lot of other things in the law. It often depends on
the judge, and how he reads the facts of the case, and whether he's
all for the letter of the law, or one of the larger-minded sort, who
give the spirit a chance. A man not heard about for seven years may
be counted dead in the eyes of the law; but there's no presumption he
died at any particular time in the seven years, and it isn't enough
to say, 'Seven years are past and I'm in the right to presume
somebody dead.' You must have legal permission, and judges differ.
You've got to prove that diligent inquiries were made to find the
vanished person before you apply to the Court, and a human sort of
judge is satisfied as a rule and doesn't torment the public and sets
a man or woman free. But if circumstances show that the vanished
party wouldn't be heard of, even if he was alive, then many
frost-bound judges won't allow he's dead, or grant freedom to a
deserted partner even after seven years. So, now, though the seven
years are up, even if application was made to assume my death, it
rests on the character of the judge whether Mrs. Courtier would be
allowed to do so."
"She may not care a button about it one way or the other," said
Dinah--"any more than I do."
"Very likely. It's only of late that I've spared a thought to her.
There's very little doubt in my mind that she's settled down to being
a widow--had enough of men I reckon."
"You don't know, however?"
"I don't know--and it's time I did, I suppose. But how?"
Dinah considered.
"She's a clever woman and she may find herself very well content to
keep herself to herself as you say. Or she may not. One thing's
sure; she'll never forgive you, and she wouldn't do nothing to help
you if she could."
"She can't help, any more than she can hinder."
"'Tis a great thought--that woman. I'd give a lot to know a bit
about her," said Dinah. "Suppose, for example----"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account