Wilde, Oscar, 1854-1900 -- Criticism and interpretation
Wilde had but a short respite from the trouble of keeping up a
reputation and an income. The American dollars were soon spent, and he
had to bring to an end his Balzacian industry, and the delightful
business of being a poet in Paris. He returned to London, where he took
rooms in Charles Street, Haymarket. He had to earn a livelihood, and
poverty and his own extravagance compelled him to do that which he most
disliked, to take up again a pose whose fascination he had exhausted. He
signed an agreement with a lecture agency, and toured through the
English provinces, repeating, as cheerfully as he could, the lectures he
had given in America.
NOTE ON WILDE AND WHISTLER
Both before and after his American lecturing tour Wilde was one of
the frequenters of Whistler's studio in Chelsea. He had an
unbounded admiration for this painter, whose conversation was no
less vivid than his work, and Whistler's attitude towards him was
not so cavalier as that he adopted to others among his admirers.
Wilde, in spite of his youth, had a reputation, and shared with
Whistler the applause of any company in which they were together.
In 1883, when Wilde was to lecture to the Academy Students, he
asked Whistler what he should say to them. Whistler sketched a
lecture for him, and Wilde used parts of it with success and repaid
him by a tremendous compliment. Two years later Whistler himself
lectured, and, for his "Ten O'Clock," re-appropriated some of the
material he had suggested to his friend. That is the origin of the
accusation, so often made, that Wilde built a reputation on
borrowed bons mots. In the "Ten O'Clock," Whistler, annoyed by
Wilde's lecturing on art, as he would have been by the lecturing of
any other man who was not himself a painter, held a veiled figure
of him up to ridicule, and threw a stone from a frail house in
jeering at his knee-breeches. "Costume is not dress. And the
wearers of wardrobes may not be doctors of taste ..." Wilde
smilingly replied. Whistler feinted. Wilde parried. Whistler
thrust:--"What has Oscar in common with Art except that he dines at
our tables and picks from our platters the plums for the pudding
that he peddles in the provinces? Oscar--the amiable,
irresponsible, esurient Oscar--with no more sense of a picture than
he has of the fit of a coat--has the courage of the opinions ... of
others!" Wilde answered that "with our James vulgarity begins at
home and should be allowed to stay there," and with that their
friendship was buried, like the hatchet, "in the side of the
enemy." Two years later, Wilde, with an indifference amusing in any
case and delightful if it was conscious, roused further protest by
using in "The Decay of Lying" the phrase, "the courage of the
opinions of others," that had been the sting of Whistler's
reproach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account