Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use It — John Shaqi
Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use ItBrandeis, Louis Dembitz
History
Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use It
Brandeis, Louis Dembitz
Banks and banking -- United States; Finance -- United States
“Beyond these inner groups and sub-groups are banks and bankers
throughout the country who co-operate with them in underwriting
or guaranteeing the sale of securities offered to the public,
and who also act as distributors of such securities. It was
impossible to learn the identity of these corporations, owing to
the unwillingness of the members of the inner group to disclose
the names of their underwriters, but sufficient appears to justify
the statement that there are at least hundreds of them and that
they extend into many of the cities throughout this and foreign
countries.
“The patronage thus proceeding from the inner group and its
sub-groups is of great value to these banks and bankers, who
are thus tied by self-interest to the great issuing houses and
may be regarded as a part of this vast financial organization.
Such patronage yields no inconsiderable part of the income of
these banks and bankers and without much risk on account of the
facilities of the principal groups for placing issues of securities
through their domination of great banks and trust companies and
their other domestic affiliations and their foreign connections.
The underwriting commissions on issues made by this inner group
are usually easily earned and do not ordinarily involve the
underwriters in the purchase of the underwritten securities.
Their interest in the transaction is generally adjusted unless
they choose to purchase part of the securities, by the payment to
them of a commission. There are, however, occasions on which this
is not the case. The underwriters are then required to take the
securities. Bankers and brokers are so anxious to be permitted to
participate in these transactions under the lead of the inner group
that as a rule they join when invited to do so, regardless of their
approval of the particular business, lest by refusing they should
thereafter cease to be invited.”
In other words, an invitation from these royal bankers is interpreted
as a command. As a result, these great bankers frequently get huge
commissions without themselves distributing any of the bonds, or ever
having taken any actual risk.
“In the case of the New York subway financing of $170,000,000 of bonds
by Messrs. Morgan & Co. and their associates, Mr. Davison [as the Pujo
Committee reports] estimated that there were from 100 to 125 such
underwriters who were apparently glad to agree that Messrs. Morgan
& Co., the First National Bank, and the National City Bank should
receive 3 per cent.,--equal to $5,100,000--for forming this syndicate,
thus relieving themselves from all liability, whilst the underwriters
assumed the risk of what the bonds would realize and of being required
to take their share of the unsold portion.”
THE PROTECTION OF PSEUDO-ETHICS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account