Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use ItBrandeis, Louis Dembitz
History
Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use It
Brandeis, Louis Dembitz
Banks and banking -- United States; Finance -- United States
And the directors of our great banking institutions, as the ultimate
judges of bank credit, exercise today a function no less important
to the country’s welfare than that of the judges of our courts, the
interstate commerce commissioners, and departmental heads.
SCOPE OF THE PROHIBITION
In the proposals for legislation on this subject, four important
questions are presented:
1. Shall the principle of prohibiting interlocking directorates
in potentially competing corporations be applied to state banking
institutions, as well as the national banks?
2. Shall it be applied to all kinds of corporations or only to banking
institutions?
3. Shall the principle of prohibiting corporations from entering into
transactions in which the management has a private interest be applied
to both directors and officers or be confined in its application to
officers only?
4. Shall the principle be applied so as to prohibit transactions with
another corporation in which one of its directors is interested merely
as a stockholder?
CHAPTER IV
SERVE ONE MASTER ONLY
The Pujo Committee has presented the facts concerning the Money Trust
so clearly that the conclusions appear inevitable. Their diagnosis
discloses intense financial concentration and the means by which it is
effected. Combination,--the intertwining of interests,--is shown to be
the all-pervading vice of the present system. With a view to freeing
industry, the Committee recommends the enactment of twenty-one specific
remedial provisions. Most of these measures are wisely framed to meet
some abuse disclosed by the evidence; and if all of these were adopted
the Pujo legislation would undoubtedly alleviate present suffering and
aid in arresting the disease. But many of the remedies proposed are
“local” ones; and a cure is not possible, without treatment which is
fundamental. Indeed, a major operation is necessary. This the Committee
has hesitated to advise; although the fundamental treatment required is
simple: “Serve one Master only.”
The evils incident to interlocking directorates are, of course,
fully recognized; but the prohibitions proposed in that respect are
restricted to a very narrow sphere.
_First:_ The Committee recognizes that potentially competing
corporations should not have a common director;--but it restricts this
prohibition to directors of national banks, saying:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account