BACK WITH THE BIG GUNS
THE American Expeditionary Force which went into the great
training-schools of France and England was like nothing so much as a
child who, having long been tutored in a programme of his own make, an
abundance of what he liked and nothing of what he didn't, should be
thrust into some grade of a public school. He would be ridiculously
advanced in mathematics and a dunce at grammar, or historian to his
finger-tips and ignorant that two and two make four. He would amaze his
fellow pupils in each respect equally.
And that was the lot of the Expeditionary Force. The French found them
backward in trench work and bombing, and naturally enough expected that
backwardness to follow through. They conceded the natural quickness of
the pupils, but saw a long road ahead before they could become an army.
Then the Americans tackled artillery, hardest and deepest of the war
problems, and suddenly blossomed out as experts.
Of course, the analogy is not to be leaned on too heavily. The Americans
were not, on the instant, the arch-exponents of artillery in all Europe.
But it is true that in comparison to the size of their army, and to the
extent to which they had prepared nationally for war, their artillery
was stronger than that of any other country on the Allied side at the
beginning of the war, notwithstanding that it was the point where they
might legitimately have been expected to be the weakest.
Hilaire Belloc called the American artillery preparation one of the most
dramatic and welcome surprises of the war.
It must be understood that all this applies only to men and not in the
least to guns. For big guns, the American reliance was wholly upon
France and England, upon the invitation of those two countries when
America entered the war.
And the readiness of America's men was not due to a large preparation in
artillery as such. The blessing arose from the fact that the coast
defense could be diverted, within the first year of war, to the handling
of the big guns for land armies, and thus strengthen the artillery arm
sent to France for final training.
Artillery was every country's problem, even in peace-times. It was the
service which required the greatest wealth and the most profound
training. There was no such thing as a citizenry trained to artillery.
Mathematics was its stronghold, and no smattering could be made to do.
Even more than mathematics was the facility of handling the big guns
when mathematics went askew from special conditions.
These things the coast defense had, if not in final perfection, at least
in creditable degree. And the diversion of it to the artillery in France
stiffened the backbone of the Expeditionary Force to the pride of the
force and the glad amazement of its preceptors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account