Our Atomic World: The Story of Atomic EnergyCraven, C. Jackson (Claude Jackson)
History
Our Atomic World: The Story of Atomic Energy
Craven, C. Jackson (Claude Jackson)
Nuclear energy -- Popular works
“If this be the case, we must conclude that the nitrogen atom is
disintegrated under the intense forces developed in a close collision
with a swift alpha particle, and that the hydrogen atom which is
liberated formed a constituent part of the nitrogen nucleus.... The
results as a whole suggest that, if alpha particles or similar
projectiles of still greater energy were available for experiment, we
might expect to break down the nuclear structure of many of the lighter
atoms.”
This prediction has certainly been verified through the use of the
atomic artillery provided by extremely powerful particle accelerators,
or “atom smashers.”[1]
[Illustration: _The Bevatron accelerator at the University of
California’s Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley, California,
shown after recent remodeling in which it was enclosed in concrete
shielding._
Courtesy Lawrence Radiation Laboratory]
Patrick Blackett in England and W. D. Harkins in the United States soon
proved independently that, during the nuclear event reported by
Rutherford in his 1919 paper, an alpha particle combines with a nitrogen
nucleus and that the resulting unstable combination immediately emits a
proton and ends up as one of the isotopes of oxygen. This was the first
instance of deliberate transmutation of one stable chemical element into
another. Since that time practically every known element has been
transmuted by bombardment. The dream of the alchemists has been
partially fulfilled in that mercury has been changed into gold. We say
“partially fulfilled” because the process is much too expensive to be
economically profitable.
Some Particles Have No Electric Charge
During the early 1920s a number of investigators, including Harkins in
the United States, Orme Masson in Australia, and Rutherford and his
assistant James Chadwick in England, seriously considered the
possibility that a neutral particle might exist in nature, possibly
formed by the very close association of a proton and an electron.
However, strenuous efforts to produce such particles by combining
protons and electrons were unsuccessful.
During these years the new technique of bombarding all kinds of matter
with alpha particles to see what would happen was widely exploited, and
it gradually became clear that in a few instances a peculiar and highly
penetrating kind of radiation was produced. In 1932, Chadwick succeeded
in showing that the peculiar radiation must consist of a stream of
particles, each weighing about the same as a proton but having no
electrical charge.
The name “neutron” for a possible neutral particle of this type was
suggested by Harkins in the United States in 1921. Much evidence now
exists that the neutron is a fundamental particle in its own right and
that it should not be thought of merely as a particle formed by a very
close association between a proton and an electron.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account