Our Calendar: The Julian calendar and its errors. How corrected by the Gregorian. Rules for finding the dominical letter, and the day of the week of any event from the days of Julius Caesar 46 B.C. to the year of our Lord four thousand; a new and easy method of fixing the date of Easter. Hebrew calendar; showing the correspondence in the date of events recorded in the Bible with our present Gregorian calendar. Illustrated by valuable tables and charts. — John Shaqi
Our Calendar: The Julian calendar and its errors. How corrected by the Gregorian. Rules for finding the dominical letter, and the day of the week of any event from the days of Julius Caesar 46 B.C. to the year of our Lord four thousand; a new and easy method of fixing the date of Easter. Hebrew calendar; showing the correspondence in the date of events recorded in the Bible with our present Gregorian calendar. Illustrated by valuable tables and charts.Packer, George Nichols
History
Our Calendar: The Julian calendar and its errors. How corrected by the Gregorian. Rules for finding the dominical letter, and the day of the week of any event from the days of Julius Caesar 46 B.C. to the year of our Lord four thousand; a new and easy method of fixing the date of Easter. Hebrew calendar; showing the correspondence in the date of events recorded in the Bible with our present Gregorian calendar. Illustrated by valuable tables and charts.
Packer, George Nichols
Calendar; Jewish calendar
January 1st be represented by A, Sun.
Feb. 1st (4 w. 3 d. from the preceding date) by D, Wed.
Mar. 1st 4 w. 0 d. " " " by D, Wed.
Apr. 1st 4 w. 3 d. " " " by G, Sat.
May 1st 4 w. 2 d. " " " by B, Mon.
June 1st 4 w. 3 d. " " " by E, Thur.
July 1st 4 w. 2 d. " " " by G, Sat.
Aug. 1st 4 w. 3 d. " " " by C, Tues.
Sept. 1st 4 w. 3 d. " " " by F, Fri.
Oct. 1st 4 w. 2 d. " " " by A, Sun.
Nov. 1st 4 w. 3 d. " " " by D, Wed.
Dec. 1st 4 w. 2 d. " " " by F, Fri.
Now each of these letters placed opposite the months respectively
represents the day of the week on which the month commences, and they are
the first letters of each word in the preceding couplet.
To find the day of the week on which a given day of any year will occur,
we have the following
RULE.
Find the dominical letter for the year. Read from this to the letter which
begins the given month, always reading from A toward G, calling the
dominical letter Sunday, the next Monday, etc. This will show on what day
of the week the month commenced; then reckoning the number of days from
this will give the day required.
EXAMPLES.
History records the fall of Constantinople on May 29th, 1453. On what day
of the week did it occur? We have then 1453 / 4 = 363 +; 1453 + 363 =
1816; 1816 / 7 = 259, remainder 3. Then 10 - 3 = 7; therefore, G being the
seventh letter is dominical letter for 1453. Now reading from G to B, the
letter for May, we have G Sunday, A Monday, and B Tuesday; hence May
commenced on Tuesday and the 29th was Tuesday.
The change from Old to New Style was made by Pope Gregory XIII, October
5th, 1582. On what day of the week did it occur? We have then 1582 / 4 =
395+; 1582 + 395 = 1977; 1977 / 7 = 282, remainder 3. Then 10 - 3 = 7;
therefore, G being the seventh letter, is dominical letter for 1582. Now
reading from G to A, the letter for October, we have G Sunday, A Monday,
etc. Hence October commenced on Monday, and the 5th was Friday.
On what day of the week did the 15th of the same month fall in 1582? We
have then 1582 / 4 = 395+; 1582 + 395 = 1977; 1977 / 7 = 282, remainder 3.
Then 6 - 3 = 3; therefore, C being the third letter, is the dominical
letter for 1582. Now reading from C to A, the letter for October, we have
C Sunday, D Monday, E Tuesday, etc. Hence October commenced on Friday, and
the 15th was Friday.
How is this, says one? You have just shown by computation that October,
1582, commenced on Monday, you now say that it occurred on Friday. You
also stated that the 5th was Friday; you now say that the 15th was Friday.
This is absurd; ten is not a multiple of seven. There is nothing absurd
about it. The former computation was Old Style, the latter New Style, the
Old being ten days behind the new.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account