In H. L. Mencken’s favor is his absence of the usual gush about
feminine beauty. He declares with refreshing honesty that in contrast
to the female body a milk jug or even a cuspidor is a thing of
intelligent and gratifying design. Of woman’s superior mental ability
he says, “A cave man is all muscle and mush. Without a woman to think
for him, he is truly a lamentable spectacle, a baby with whiskers,
a rabbit with the frame of an aurochs, a feeble and preposterous
caricature of God.” What a pity that women use all these advantages of
superior mentality and ability only in the age-old game of man-hunting.
But do they?
D. H. Lawrence shares this philosophy of the chief business of women,
and he is much more gloomy about it. In fact, he is decidedly neurotic
in his fear of the ultimate absorption of man. Woman he describes
perpetually as a great, magnetic womb, fecund, powerful, drawing,
engulfing. Man he sees as a pitiful, struggling creature, ultimately
devoured by fierce maternal force. “You absorb, absorb,” cries Paul
to Miriam in “Sons and Lovers,” “as if you must fill yourself up with
love because you’ve got a shortage somewhere.” The Lawrence model,
madly, fiercely possessive, differs from older forms in the abundance
of physiological and pathological trimming. His conclusion, as voiced
again by Paul to Miriam is, “A woman only works with part of herself;
the real and vital part is covered up.” And this hidden reality is her
terrific, destructive, fervid determination to drown man in her embrace.
So it goes. To Floyd Dell woman is a Mother, to H. L. Mencken a Wife,
to W. L. George a Courtesan, and to D. H. Lawrence a Matrix--always
specialized to sex. There may be men who are able to think of woman
apart from the pattern of function, but they are inarticulate. Most of
them spend their lives associating with a symbol. The set pieces they
call Mary, Martha, Elaine, or Marguerite may follow the standardized
design of grandmother, mother, or aunt. Or in more advanced circles,
the pattern may call for bobbed hair, knickers, and cigarette case.
Under any form of radicalism or conservatism the stereotype remains.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account