The old morality was built upon this body of folk-lore about women.
Whether pictured as a chaste and beautiful angel, remote and untainted
by life’s realities, or more cynically regarded as a devil and the
source of sin, the notion was always according to pattern. Naturally,
the relationship of men and women has been built upon the design,
and a great many of our social ideals and customs follow it. The
angel concept led, of course, to the so-called double standard which
provides for a class of Victorian dolls who personify goodness, while
their sisters, the prostitutes, serve as sacrificial offerings to
the wicked ways of men. The new morality, as yet rather nebulous and
somewhat mythical, has fewer class distinctions. The angel picture,
for instance, has had some rude blows. As portrayed by the vanguard of
radicals and interpreters, however, the changing conventions have their
roots in the old generalizations and phantasies.
Perhaps this is only to be expected, for the man or woman does not
exist whose mind has not become so filled with accepted ideas of human
beings and relationships before maturity, or even adolescence, that
what is seen thereafter is chiefly a fog of creeds and patterns. If
several hundred babies, children of good inherited backgrounds, could
be brought up on an isolated island, without a taint of superimposed
custom and never hearing generalizations about themselves--never
having standardized characteristics laid heavily upon their shoulders,
perhaps a different type of relationship founded upon actualities,
would be evolved. Without a mythology of attributes, based chiefly upon
biological functions, real human beings might discover each other and
create new and honest ways of comradeship and association. As it is
to-day, we do not know what the pristine reactions of individuals, free
from the modifications of stereotype, would be like.
It was the development of means by which beliefs could be separated
from actual facts which brought modern science into being and freed
the world from the quaint superstitions of the ages. Not until the
nature of substance could be proved and classified in contrast with the
mass of ignorant notions which clogged ancient thought was the amazing
mechanical, economic, and scientific advance of the last century
possible. The world of antiquity had standardized life and tied thought
down to speculative creeds. Empirical science discarded all supposition
and centered itself upon building up another picture--life as an
examination of its actual nature proved it to be.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account