Our Domestic Birds: Elementary Lessons in AvicultureRobinson, John H. (John Henry)
Science
Our Domestic Birds: Elementary Lessons in Aviculture
Robinson, John H. (John Henry)
Cage birds; Pigeons; Poultry
=Development of principal races of fowls.= There is no evidence that any
of the ancient civilized peoples made any effort to improve the fowl,
nor have any improved races been produced in the lands where those
civilizations flourished. Outside of this area many different types were
gradually developed to suit the needs or the tastes of people in
different countries and localities. Thus in the course of centuries were
produced from the same original wild stock fowls as unlike as the
massive Brahma, with feathered legs and feet, and the diminutive Game
Bantam; the Leghorn, with its large comb, and the Polish, with only the
rudiments of a comb and in its place a great ball of feathers; the
Spanish, with monstrous development of the skin of the face, and the
Silky, with dark skin and hairlike plumage. Except in a few limited
districts these special types did not displace the ordinary type for
many centuries. Until modern times they were hardly known outside of the
districts or the countries where they originated. Of the details of
their origin nothing is known. They were not of the highly specialized
and finished types such as are bred by fanciers now. Their distinctive
features had been established, but in comparatively crude form. The
refining and perfecting of all these types has been the work of fanciers
in Holland, Belgium, England, and America in modern times. These
fanciers have also developed new races of more serviceable types.
[Illustration: Fig. 17. Light Brahma hen]
[Illustration: Fig. 18. Red Pile Game Bantam cock]
[Illustration: Fig. 19. Red Pile Game Bantam hen]
=How fowls were kept in old times.= Less than a century ago it was
quite a common practice among the cottagers of England and Scotland to
keep their fowls in their cottages at night. Sometimes a loft, to which
the birds had access by a ladder outside, was fitted up for them.
Sometimes perches for the fowls were put in the living room of the
cottage. Such practices seem to us wrong from a sanitary standpoint, but
it is only within very recent times that people have given careful
attention to sanitation, and in old times, when petty thieving was more
common than it is now, there was a decided advantage in having such
small domestic animals as poultry and pigs where they could not be
disturbed without the owner's knowing it. The practice of keeping fowls
in the owner's dwelling seems to have been confined to the poorer
people, who had no large domestic animals for which they must provide
suitable outbuildings. On large farms special houses were sometimes
provided for poultry, but they were probably oftener housed with other
animals, for few people thought it worth while to give them special
attention.
[Illustration: Fig. 20. White-Faced Black Spanish cockerel. (Photograph
from R. A. Rowan, Los Angeles, California)]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account