British -- France -- Fiction; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction; Historical fiction
“And I for one would descend and leave it. Ah, bah! one may mount to
the topmost branch of a tree, and yet be no nearer escaping from the
forest. I find myself here in interminable thickets, monsieur. I see
the poor, leaf-blinded denizens of them nosing passionlessly for roots
and acorns in a loveless gloom; and I know the long green fields of
light and pleasure to stretch all round this core of melancholy, if
only these could find the way to win to them. Is self-discipline
necessary to existence? Surely our very butterflies of fashion prove
the contrary.”
“Now what,” thought Ned, “is the goad to this inexplicable character?”
“Does monsieur, then,” said he, “advocate a creed of hedonism?”
“Why not?” cried the other. “Shall not man enlarge, develop, and
become more habitually one with his amiable instincts under the
influence of pleasure, than he ever has done in his bondage to a
religion of self-denial? To deny oneself is to deny God, after whose
image one is made.”
“A pretty conceit,” said Ned; “but it spells degeneracy.”
“Ay, monsieur; and to the very foundations--as far back as the garden
of Paradise.”
“What! You would revert to primitive conditions?”
“To the very ‘naked and unashamed’--but applying to that state the
influence of long traditions of gentle manners. We will admit the
happiness of the community to be the first consideration, and
reconstruct upon a basis of nature.”
A spot of colour came to his cheek. His eyes kindled with a light of
febrile enthusiasm.
“To be free to enjoy, in a world of yielding generosities,” he cried;
“to be cast from restrictions designed to the selfish aggrandisement
of infinitely less than a moiety of our race; to strip indulgence of
the shamefulness that century-long cant has credited it withal--that
is the El Dorado I give my efforts and my substance to attain.”
“There,” thought Ned, “is confessed the animalism to which the other
is but a blind. But this is half-effeminate vapouring.”
He had no sympathy, indeed, with theories so untenable. This
lickerish, unconstructive paganism was far from being the lodestar to
his own revolutionary cock-boat. Yet he could not but marvel over M.
de St Denys’ extremely practical expression of extremely frothy
sentiments. Involuntarily he glanced round the room.
“Yes,” cried the other, observant of the look. “I am not one of those
doctors who refuse their own medicine.”
A thought of surprise seemed to strike him.
“But I run ahead of my manners,” cried he, with a quick laugh. “You
charge me with a letter, and I return you a volley of exposition. I
have not even offered you a seat. Pray accommodate yourself with one.
And you knew my father, sir?”
“I had not the honour. He was a friend of my lord viscount.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account