Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
The contest was one of great activity, with much more bitterness
exhibited by the Democratic factions toward each other than either
displayed toward the Republicans. Douglas took the stump and spoke as
far South as New Orleans, throughout the West, in various places in New
York and other Eastern States. His speeches were the ablest and most
aggressive ever delivered in a national contest. Lincoln, Breckenridge,
and Bell took no prominent individual part in the battle. One of the
peculiar features of the campaign of 1860 was the development of a
war spirit in the North that was quickened by the organization known
as “The Wide-Awakes.” They were Republican organizations uniformed by
caps and capes, and each one carrying a lantern in night processions.
Many of them drilled as military companies, for the threat of war came
up with almost every echo from the South. The young men of the North,
and especially the young men just from our colleges, entered largely
and very enthusiastically into the Lincoln ranks, and in no previous
Presidential battle was there such able and general discussion of
public questions on the hustings. The slavery question had presented a
new phase to the people of the North. It was not a mere battle against
slavery, although that appealed very strongly to the convictions of
most of the Republicans, but the South had, by the deliverances of its
leading men, made the issue directly against the mastery of the free
labor of the North. It was denounced by some of the ablest Southern
leaders as unworthy of respect or recognition, holding that labor was
menial, and that the North was made up very largely of “small-fisted
farmers” and “greasy mechanics,” and Senator Chestnut, of South
Carolina, who delivered the most honest and one of the ablest speeches
on the labor question, compared the slave labor of the South most
favorably with the “mud-sills of the North.” This attitude of the South
logically brought the most intelligent labor classes of all conditions
into the support of the Republican ticket to vindicate their own
manhood and independence. The following table presents the popular and
electoral vote:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account