Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
These measures were in harmony with the Federal theory of government.
The Federal leaders did not believe the people capable of
self-government, and Adams felt justified in imposing the severest
penalties upon all who severely criticised or violently opposed the
administration. Washington was yet alive and in full mental and
physical vigor when these laws were passed, and it is reasonable to
assume that he approved of them, as he could have defeated them if he
had opposed their enactment. Hamilton vainly protested against the
Alien and Sedition laws as a fatal political blunder, but Federalism
had never suffered defeat, and President Adams never doubted his
re-election until the vote was declared against him.
The contest of 1800 had its lines so well defined from the outset that
candidates for President and Vice-President were as clearly indicated,
although without any formal declaration, as national tickets would be
indicated by a national convention of modern times. There is no record
of the Congressional caucus in 1800, but it seems to be an accepted
tradition that the Federals, who had a majority of the House, first
called a secret caucus to confer about the management of the campaign.
They did not formally name candidates, but by general consent Adams
was accepted as the candidate for President and Charles C. Pinckney,
of South Carolina, for Vice-President. Apparently well-authenticated
reports tell of a Republican Congressional caucus held during the
same year, but there is no preserved record of it. If such a caucus
was held, candidates were not nominated nor was any declaration of
principles made. The chief object of the Republican caucus seems
to have been to harmonize the friends of Jefferson on Burr as the
accepted candidate for Vice-President, but no preference was expressed
in any formal way. When the Federalists held their first caucus the
Republicans denounced it as a “Jacobinical conclave,” and so severe
were the criticisms of the Philadelphia _Aurora_, the leading Jefferson
organ, that its editor was at one time arraigned before the bar of the
Senate.
The contest of 1800 opened early in the year, the reported
Congressional caucuses having been held in February or March, and from
that time until the election the political discussions were acrimonious
to a degree that would surprise the present generation. Jefferson had
cordially united his friends in the support of Burr, and it was Burr’s
magnificent leadership that carried the electoral vote of New York by
winning the Legislature of that State as early as May. New York had
voted for Adams in 1796, and the loss to Adams of one of the leading
States of the Union and its transfer to Jefferson made the battle next
to hopeless for Adams, but he and his friends fought it out to the
bitter end.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account