Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
The Democratic National Convention met in New York on the 4th of July,
and there was a strong sentiment among the delegates favorable to the
nomination of a liberal Republican for President. The Republicans had
nominated a Democrat, and Chief Justice Chase, who was an old-time
Democrat, and who had won a very large measure of Democratic confidence
by his rulings in the impeachment case of President Johnson, was a
favorite with a very powerful circle of friends, who had quietly, but
very thoroughly, as they believed, organized to have him nominated by a
spontaneous tidal wave after a protracted deadlock between the leading
candidates. I have every reason to believe that Chase would have been
nominated at the time Seymour was chosen, and in like manner, had it
not been for the carefully laid plan of Samuel J. Tilden to prevent
the success of Chase. Horatio Seymour, the ablest Democrat of that
day, was president of the convention, and he had no more idea of being
nominated for President than he had of becoming the Czar of Russia. It
was generally supposed that Seymour left the chair of the convention
because some votes had been cast for him for President, but he really
left the chair because he expected to aid in the nomination of Chase,
and when Seymour called another to preside, the Tilden strategy
completed its purpose by an able Democrat demanding the nomination of
Horatio Seymour, and delivering a most eloquent and impressive eulogy
upon the confessed leader of the Democracy. In vain did Seymour give
a peremptory declination. The convention had been organized for its
work, and men in nearly every delegation who had been assigned to their
task rose and swelled the hurrah for Seymour. When he found the tide
was likely to be overwhelming, he declared with equal earnestness and
pathos, “Your candidate I cannot be;” but the wave sped on and Seymour
was made the candidate by a practically unanimous vote.
He was prevailed upon to consider the subject, and that meant, of
course, that he could not decline. There had been twenty-one ballots
before the nomination of Seymour, in which Pendleton, Hancock, and
Hendricks were the leading competitors. It was then that the nomination
of Chase was expected to be made just as the nomination of Seymour was
made, and Tilden’s was the master hand that shaped the action of the
convention.
Tilden was a master leader, as subtle and sagacious as he was able,
and he thoroughly organized the plan to nominate Seymour, not so
much because he desired Seymour as the candidate, as because he was
implacable in his hostility to Chase. It was well known by Chase and
his friends that Tilden crucified Chase in the Democratic convention
of 1868, and this act of Tilden’s had an impressive sequel eight years
later, when the election of Tilden hung in the balance in the Senate,
and when the accomplished daughter of Chase decided the battle against
Tilden.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account