Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
With Jefferson’s success in 1800 came, for the first time, the control
of the Republicans in both branches of Congress, and Jefferson thus had
the entire legislative power of the Government in thorough sympathy and
harmony with himself. He was bitterly opposed by the Federalists at
every step. They justly criticised his hostility to an American navy;
they complained vehemently of his removals from office in partisan
interests, and they specially assailed his ostentatious attempts to
limit the authority and powers of the General Government to give the
supreme sovereignty of the nation to the people.
The one act of his administration that was most violently assailed
was his purchase of Louisiana in 1803. It was proclaimed by the
Federalists as the most flagrant usurpation of authority, as an utter
overthrow of the Constitution, and as the beginning of the end of the
Union. There is not an argument made to-day against the acquisition of
the Philippines and Puerto Rico that is not the echo of the earnest
arguments made by the Federalists against the acquisition of Louisiana.
The ablest of the Federalists proclaimed in the Senate and House that
the Union was practically destroyed by the acquisition of a distant
country, containing a people with no sympathy with our interests or
institutions; who were generally strangers to our language and could
never be educated to the proper standard of American citizenship. But
the country then, as now, believed in expansion, and the acquisition
of Louisiana stands out as one of the grandest achievements of
statesmanship exhibited by any administration, from Washington to
McKinley.
The contest between Jefferson and Burr for the Presidency, after
one had been distinctly supported as a candidate for President and
the other as distinctly as a candidate for Vice-President, taught
the necessity of changing the method of choosing a President in the
Electoral College, but the Federalists bitterly opposed the change,
chiefly on the ground that it was desired solely to gratify the
personal ambition and interests of Jefferson. The proposed amendment
prevailed, however, and was ratified by thirteen of the sixteen States
in ample time for the contest of 1804. The dissenting States in the
ratification of the amendment were Massachusetts, Connecticut, and
Delaware. Under that amendment the electors voted for President and
Vice-President as they do to-day, and the candidate for Vice-President
must now have a majority of the electoral vote as well as the candidate
for President to be successful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account