Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
He was at his home in Galena, not far from Chicago, during the sessions
of the convention, but while he was advised of what transpired from
day to day, he gave no directions and made no suggestions to his
friends. He had the ablest galaxy of leaders that ever appeared in a
national convention in support of any one candidate, and he trusted
them implicitly. On the morning after the convention adjourned he
came to Chicago, and I met him at the Palmer House, where he had
come to confer with his discomfited friends. His face gave no sign
of the disappointment he had suffered. He met his friends in even a
more genial way than was his custom. He expressed himself as entirely
content with the decision of the convention, and greatly appreciated
the support that had been given him. He never looked better in his
life, and while I could not congratulate him, I could truthfully
express my gratification at seeing him the picture of health and
comfort.
He was then in entire accord with his leading friends in their purpose
to prevent the election of Garfield, and for two months after the
campaign opened Garfield would have been overwhelmingly beaten, but
after Conkling’s conference with Garfield in Ohio, Grant’s friends gave
a most zealous support to Garfield’s election, and barely saved him by
the aid of Tammany’s betrayal of Hancock.
The Democratic National Convention met at Cincinnati on the 22d of
June, with John W. Stevenson, of Kentucky, as permanent president.
The dispute over contested seats lasted until the second day.
Massachusetts, that had never voted for a Democratic candidate for
President, put up the fiercest fight between disputing delegations,
and New York had a bitter factional quarrel between delegations chosen
by the regular Democrats and another chosen by the Tammany people. The
Tammany followers, under the lead of John Kelly, were very vindictive
in their opposition to Tilden, openly declaring that they would not
support Tilden if nominated, and the Tammany delegation was rejected.
The position of Tilden was regarded as doubtful until well on in the
second day of the contest, when an elaborate letter from him was read
to the convention withdrawing his name. The letter had been prepared
by Tilden and given to a trusted friend to use it only if it became
evident that Tilden could not be again nominated, or that he could not
be elected if nominated. The judgment of his most dispassionate friends
was that he might be nominated, but that he could not be elected, with
the fierce opposition of Tammany and his failure to assert his right to
the Presidency in 1877.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account