Our Presidents and how we make themMcClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
History
Our Presidents and how we make them
McClure, Alexander K. (Alexander Kelly)
Presidents -- United States -- Election
The election of James Monroe to the Presidency in 1816 and his
re-election in 1820 did not rise to the dignity of political contests.
The Federal party was practically overthrown by the success of the war
with England, and after the close of the war Federalism never asserted
itself as a political factor in national affairs. There were murmurings
of discontent in the Republican organization, but the Federalists were
then in the unenviable attitude of having sympathized with the enemy
in a foreign war, and the prejudices of the patriotic people of the
country were intensified against the action of the Hartford convention,
for which the Federalists were held responsible.
Whether justly or unjustly, it was believed by the Republicans
throughout the country that the Hartford conventionists had given
“blue-light” signals to the enemy’s ships, and thereby hindered
the escape of American vessels which were blockaded. The overthrow
of Federalism was so complete that the party never again formally
presented candidates for President and Vice-President, and the first
Monroe election of 1816 would probably have been as unanimous in the
Electoral College as was his second election but for the fact that the
three Federal States which voted against Monroe did not hold popular
elections for President at all, but chose their electors by the
Legislature. Massachusetts, the home of Adams, that had always chosen
Presidential electors by popular vote, repealed the law in 1816, so
that there was not a single elector chosen by the people against Monroe.
While Monroe’s two elections and administrations are now pointed to
as the “era of good feeling,” that has never been repeated in this
country. Monroe himself did not reach the Presidency by the rosy
path that would now be naturally accepted for him in his journey
to the highest civil trust of the nation. The usual Congressional
caucus was called on the 10th of March, 1816, asking the Republican
Senators and Representatives to meet on the 12th for the purpose of
nominating candidates for President and Vice-President. Only 58 of
the 141 Republican members attended this meeting, and, instead of
taking action, a resolution was passed calling a general caucus for
the 16th, and at that caucus 118 members appeared. There were strong
and widespread prejudices against the Congressional caucus system, and
it was denounced by many prominent Republicans as “King Caucus” that
sought to control the people in the selection of the highest officers.
[Illustration: JAMES MONROE]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account