Our Sabbaths in Danger: A Sermon, deprecating the contemplated opening of the Crystal Palace on the Lord's-DayMoore, Daniel
Religion
Our Sabbaths in Danger: A Sermon, deprecating the contemplated opening of the Crystal Palace on the Lord's-Day
Moore, Daniel
Church of England -- Sermons -- 19th century; Crystal Palace (Sydenham, London, England); Sunday; Sunday legislation -- Great Britain
I. In trying to arrive at correct notions upon what may be due to the
sacred day, and how far it may be lawful that churches and places of
amusement should share its hours between them, our first thoughts are
naturally directed to the Old Testament accounts of the Sabbath
institution itself. Was its origin paradisaical, or patriarchal, or
Levitical? And if it were either of these, were the reasons given for
commencing it such as would pass away, when the dispensation under which
it was given passed away? This question is important, because there is a
current way of speaking of the Sabbath as if it were a mere festival of
the Jewish Church, deriving its whole sanctity from the Levitical law,
and only taken up by the Christian Church at second hand,—as among the
_useful_ things of the old economy which it would be as well to
perpetuate, though not one of the _binding_ things we were under any
obligation to observe.
Now, to expose the absurdity of this notion, we have only to take the
earliest Scripture notices of the institution which come to hand. In the
second chapter of the book of Genesis, at the close of the account of the
creation, we read,—_And on the seventh day God ended his work which He
had made_; _and He rested on the seventh day from all his work which He
had made_. _And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it_: BECAUSE
_that in it He had rested from all his work which God created and made_.
If this passage stood alone, one conclusion only could be drawn from it;
namely, that the institution of the Sabbath succeeded the creation
immediately in order of time, and that it was sanctified for reasons
which must be binding on all mankind alike. But other notices in the
writings of Moses follow, which might seem to militate against this view,
and even to favour the erroneous notion I have adverted to, of the
Sabbath having only a temporary or dispensational sanctity. Thus, in the
thirty-first chapter of Exodus, we read,—_Wherefore the children of
Israel shall keep the Sabbath throughout their generations for a
perpetual covenant_: _it is a_ SIGN _between me and the children of
Israel for ever_. Whilst, further, in the book of Deuteronomy, at the
fifth chapter, we find Moses exhorting the people to the observance of
the holy day, with this added reason: _Remember that thou wast a servant
in the land of Egypt_, _and that the Lord thy God brought thee out thence
through a mighty hand and stretched-out arm_; THEREFORE _the Lord thy God
commanded thee to keep the Sabbath-day_. Now, whether we are able to
give any satisfactory account of these additional reasons for the
institution or not, the revealed fact will remain the same,—namely, that
the Sabbath was _not_ Levitical in its origin, and was not even _first_
made known to the Jews, at the giving of the law. Nothing can be plainer
than that the Sabbath was both known and observed before the Jewish
Church had any existence. For, besides the incidental notices both
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account