Our Sabbaths in Danger: A Sermon, deprecating the contemplated opening of the Crystal Palace on the Lord's-DayMoore, Daniel
Religion
Our Sabbaths in Danger: A Sermon, deprecating the contemplated opening of the Crystal Palace on the Lord's-Day
Moore, Daniel
Church of England -- Sermons -- 19th century; Crystal Palace (Sydenham, London, England); Sunday; Sunday legislation -- Great Britain
Again, in contending for the universal obligation to separate a seventh
portion of our time to the service of God, we cannot overlook the plain
intimations contained in the earliest records of all nations, that,
either with religious sanctions or without them, men have observed this
_weekly_ division of time. Chaldeans, Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, all
seem to have known of it;—and the question is how, except as the relic of
some universal tradition, those nations should have thought of such a
measurement of time at all? For other divisions of time we can find
reasons,—obvious, necessary, and natural. The daily rotation of the
earth on its axis; the completed cycle of lunar phases; the sun imparting
to the revolving worlds the blessings of cold and heat, summer and
winter, seed-time and harvest, are phenomena quite adequate to explain
why we should break up our life into _days_, and _months_, and _years_;
but for WEEKS we have _no_ such reason, nor, indeed, _any_ reason to
give, except that it is one of the original appointments and laws of God.
It is an arbitrary period, the recurrence of which neither nature nor
reason seems, in any way, to have marked out for us, but which, on the
all-commanding authority of revelation, men have been taught to set apart
to sacred remembrances. _The Sabbath was_ MADE _for man_.
III. Thus, as far as our limits would permit, I think it has been shown
that, irrespective of dispensations, or Churches, or particular
covenants, God did appoint it as an ordinance for the whole human family,
that every recurring seventh day of their life should be separated to
religious uses. He first “_blessed_” the day, that is, pledged himself
to be propitious to the service which, in spirit and in truth, men should
offer Him on that day; and then “_hallowed_” it, or, as the word is,
“_set it apart_,” intimating that anything opposed or foreign to such
religious service, was to be strictly forbidden. If this ground have
been made good, I shall be less careful to adduce all that could be said
in favour of the next question which might be raised; namely, on the
supposition that God has made this claim upon all men of a seventh
portion of their time, is _that_ seventh which has been set apart by the
Christian Church the _right_ seventh; in other words, have we sufficient
reason for believing that the change of day, from the _last_ day of the
week to the _first_, is agreeable to the will of God? Now the only
reasons, it would seem, which could justify such change, must be found
either in an express revelation, or in the ascertained practice of those,
who having for three years had the Lord of the Sabbath to guide them,
must have known on what day He designed it should thenceforth be kept. A
change of the actual day, it has been conjectured, from some expressions
in the history, was made by Moses, at the time of the Exodus,
transferring the holy day to that which first saw _Israel’s redemption
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account