Ouroboros; or, the mechanical extension of mankindGarrett, Garet
Philosophy
Ouroboros; or, the mechanical extension of mankind
Garrett, Garet
Machinery; Machinery in the workplace
In this new political dogma of an absolute economic necessity to
import food and raw materials in exchange for manufactures the ancient
myth-wish reappears. The machine does not abolish the curse of toil. It
was not the escape men sought. But it does create a preferred task.
Traditionally, the peasant-task has been despised: it bore the curse
direct. And, when the machine made it possible for many to embrace
instead what was deemed the lesser affliction of industrial labour
gregariously performed in cities, the impulse thereto was headlong.
Hence the rise of that angular phenomenon called the industrial
nation—a nation able to buy its food, therefore delivered from the fate
of peasantry and for that reason entitled to consider itself of higher
caste than agricultural nations.
Hence the tumescent city as one of the most alarming appearances of
our time.
Hence, also, that idea of economic necessity, which, getting control
of the political mind of Europe, inevitably involved the world in a
machine-war. What made that war so terrifying, so destructive, so
extensive, was the power of the machine—an inconceivable power except
as it disclosed itself from day to day. No one beholding the event from
a firmamental point of view could have supposed it was a war between
races of men. Man in contrast with the machines he served was pitifully
insignificant.
In Germany the task of bending the country’s industrial equipment to
the uses of war was assigned to a man who possessed one of the very
brilliant Jewish minds in the world. In him were combined the three
high characteristics of his race, which are loyalty, intellectual
realism, and dreaming imagination. His practical job was more complex
than that of the Chief of Staff. Yet his mind was not wholly occupied
with this care. His critical faculties and his imagination were always
free.
Reflecting on the economic meaning of the war, he was led to examine
the essential character of international trade, and so perceived
clearly how wasteful, preposterous, and dangerous a great deal of it
was—Germany pressing the surplus product of her machines for sale in
Great Britain, the British doing likewise in Germany, both competing
at home and abroad with the industrial surplus of the United States,
ships passing on the seas with cargoes of similar goods endlessly
duplicated, and all the machine-craft nations seeking peasant-nations
to be exploited for food in exchange for manufactures. It was true in
this way the world had been growing richer in things, and yet the cost
was frightful. The resort to force was a confession that international
trade was bankrupt in reason and understanding.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account