Outline Studies in the Old Testament for Bible TeachersHurlbut, Jesse Lyman
Religion
Outline Studies in the Old Testament for Bible Teachers
Hurlbut, Jesse Lyman
Bible. Old Testament -- Textbooks
1. Such deportations were a frequent =policy of Oriental conquerors=.
The Orientals had three ways of dealing with a conquered people: that of
extermination, or wholesale butchery, which is frequently described upon
the As-syr'i-an monuments; that of leaving them in the land under
tribute, as subjects of the conqueror; and that of deporting them _en
masse_ to a distant land. Frequently, when the interests of the empire
would be served by changing the population of a province, this plan was
carried out. Thus the ten tribes were carried to a land near the
Cas'pi-an Sea, and other people were brought to Sa-ma'ri-a in their
place (2 Kings 17. 6, 24). A similar plan regarding Ju'dah was proposed
by Sen-nach'e-rib (2 Kings 18. 31, 32), but was thwarted by the
destruction of the As-syr'i-an host.
2. We have already noticed another cause of the captivity in the
frequent =rebellions of the kings of Ju'dah= against the authority of
Bab'y-lon. The old spirit of independence, which had made Ju'dah the
leader of the twelve tribes, was still strong, and it was fostered by
the hope of universal rule, which had been predicted through centuries,
even while the kingdom was declining. The prophets, however, favored
submission to Bab'y-lon; but the nobles urged rebellion and
independence. Their policy was pursued, and the unequal strife was
taken up more than once. The rebellions always failed; but after several
attempts the patience of Neb-u-chad-nez'zar was exhausted, and the
destruction of the rebellious city and the deportation of the population
were ordered.
3. But underneath was another and a deeper cause--in =the rivalry of
E'gypt and Bab'y-lon=. Pal'es-tine stood on the border of the
As-syr'i-an empire toward E'gypt; and in Pal'es-tine there were two
parties, the As-syr'i-an and the E-gyp'tian: one counseling submission
to As-syr'i-a, the other seeking alliance with E'gypt against As-syr'i-a
(Isa. 31. 1-3; 37. 6). After Bab'y-lon took the place of Nin'e-veh the
Chal-de'an party took the place of the As-syr'i-an, as the Chal-de'an
empire was the successor of the As-syr'i-an empire. The prophets, led by
Jer-e-mi'ah, always counseled submission to Bab'y-lon, and warned
against trusting to E'gypt, which had never given anything more than
promises; but the nobles were of the E-gyp'tian party, and constantly
influenced the kings to renounce the yoke of Bab'y-lon and to strike for
independence by the aid of E'gypt. The necessity of making the frontier
of the Chal-de'an empire safe on the side toward E'gypt was the
political cause for the deportation of the tribe of Ju'dah.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account