Outlines of a mechanical theory of storms : $b containing the true law of lunar influence, with practical instructions to the navigator, to enable him approximately to calculate the coming changes of the wind and weather, for any given day, and for any part of the oceanBassnett, Thomas
Science
Outlines of a mechanical theory of storms : $b containing the true law of lunar influence, with practical instructions to the navigator, to enable him approximately to calculate the coming changes of the wind and weather, for any given day, and for any part of the ocean
Bassnett, Thomas
Weather
the record of the weather in the second section of this work, an auroral
display will be found on July 12th, the central vortex having passed a
little to the northward the same evening, and the next day passing south
_descending_. On that occasion the author saw an inclined column, in
profile, due east, and between himself and a line of bluffs and timber,
about eight miles distant; And, he has not any doubt that the mass of
rays began where he stood. As in a shower, every drop, passing through a
conical surface, whose axis passes through the sun and through the eye,
contributes to form the apparently distant rainbow.
The altitude of this meteor has been much exaggerated, especially of
those rings or luminous arches, which are often detached completely from
the luminous bank. On the 24th of May, a bright aurora was visible at
Ottawa, but the author's attention was engrossed by the most brilliant
arch of light he had ever seen. It was all the time south of the zenith,
and had no visible connection with the aurora north. At 9 hours, 59
minutes, 30 seconds mean solar time, Arcturus was in the exact centre of
the band, at which time it was very bright, and full 7° wide. At the
same time, Prof. G.W. Wheeler observed the aurora in Perryville, in the
State of Missouri, only 1° of longitude to the westward, but did not see
the arch.[31] The difference of latitude between the two places being 3°
30′, and the weather, as he states, clear and still, there is only one
reason why he did not see the arch: it must have been too _low_, and had
become merged in the bank of light. At the time mentioned, the altitude
of Arcturus was 68° 30′, and, as Prof. Wheeler assigns only 10° as the
altitude of the bank, the maximum elevation of the arch, on the
supposition of its composing a part of the bank, was 43 miles. At
Perryville, the bank and streamers had disappeared at 10 o'clock. At
Ottawa, the arch or bow disappeared at 10 h. 5 m., differing only the
fraction of a minute from the time at Perryville; but, the bank was
still visible, but low and faint, the greatest altitude having been over
30°. To show the rapid fluctuations in width and position of this bow,
we will add a few of the minutes taken at the time with great care, in
hopes some other observer had been equally precise. When first seen,
there were three luminous patches, or elongated clouds of light; one in
Leo, one in Bootes, and another in Ophinchus, all in line. This was
about 9h. 15m. The times following are correct to 30 seconds:
9h. 42m. 30s. Bow complete; south edge 2° north of Arcturus.
9 45 30 Northern edge diffuse south; edge bright, and well
defined; 10° wide in zenith; north edge on Alphacca.
9 47 30 South edge 5° north of Arcturus; north edge close to
Cor. Caroli.
9 53 30 Eastern half composed of four detached bands
_shingling_ over each other.
58 30 Arcturus on south; bow narrower.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account