Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and TurgénieffHuneker, James
Philosophy
Overtones, a book of temperaments : $b Richard Strauss, Parsifal, Verdi, Balzac, Flaubert, Nietzsche, and Turgénieff
Huneker, James
Music
And now to a complete analysis of the work, an analysis, be it said,
first made at Bayreuth in August, 1901. That it may prove unpleasant
reading for some I do not doubt. I only hope that I shall not be
accused of artistic irreverence. The personal equation counts for
something in criticism. I cannot admire Parsifal, and I am giving my
reasons for this dislike. There is no reason why the criticism that
has so royally acclaimed the beauty of Wagner’s other music-dramas
should be suspected in the case of Parsifal. Why should Parsifal be
hedged as if of “sacred character”? If you tell a Parsifalite that
the opera is blasphemous, he proves volubly, ingeniously, that it
is pure symbolism, that Saracenic, Buddhistic, any but Christian,
ceremonial is employed. But if you turn the tables, and assert that
Parsifal is not sacred, that it should be enjoyed and criticised
like Tristan and Isolde, the Parsifalite quickly jumps the track
and exclaims, “Sir, there is sacred atmosphere in Parsifal, and
not in Tristan!” Oh, this sacred atmosphere! It is worse than
Nietzsche’s Holy Laughter! The question may be summed up thus: If
Parsifal is blasphemous, it should not be tolerated; if it is not
a representation of sacred matter, then we have the privilege of
criticising it as we do a Verdi or a Meyerbeer opera; and Meyerbeer
was an inveterate mocker of religious things—witness Les Huguenots,
Robert le Diable, Le Prophète. How about Halévy’s La Juive? Parsifal,
so it appears to me, is more morbid than blasphemous.
Ready-made admiration is dangerous. It behooves us to study Parsifal
for ourselves, and not accept as gospel the uncritical enthusiasms
of the Wagnerite who is without a sense of the eternal fitness of
things. One ounce of humor, of common sense, puts to flight the
sham ethical and the sham æsthetical of the Parsifal worshippers.
And level-headed study should prove of profit. The composition is a
miracle of polyphonic architecture—and it is also the weakest that
its creator ever planned.
PARSIFAL
Parsifal a vaincu les filles, leur gentil
Babil et la luxure amusante et sa pente
Vers la chair de garçon vierge que cela tente
D’aimer les seins légers et ce gentil babil.
Il a vaincu la femme belle au cœur subtil
Étalant ces bras frais et sa gorge excitante;
Il a vaincu l’enfer, et rentre dans sa tente
Avec un lourd trophée à son bras puéril.
Avec la lance qui perça le flanc suprême!
Il a guéri le roi, le voici roi lui-même
Et prêtre du très-saint trésor essentiel;
En robe d’or il adore, gloire et symbole,
Le vase pur où resplendit le sang réel,
—Et, ô ces voix d’enfants chantant dans la coupole.
—PAUL VERLAINE.
I
THE BOOK
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account