Owen's Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population Question — John Shaqi
Owen's Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population QuestionOwen, Robert Dale
Philosophy
Owen's Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population Question
Owen, Robert Dale
Birth control; Malthusianism
Among the human instincts which contribute to man’s preservation and
well-being, the instinct of reproduction holds a distinguished rank. It
peoples the earth; it perpetuates the species. Controlled by reason, and
chastened by good feeling, it gives to social intercourse much of its
charm and zest. Directed by selfishness, or governed by force, it is
prolific of misery and degradation. Whether wisely or unwisely directed,
its influence is that of a master principle, that colours, brightly or
darkly, much of the destiny of man.
It is sometimes spoken of as a low and selfish propensity; and the
Shakers call it a “carnal and sensual passion.”[7] I see nothing in the
instinct itself that merits such epithets. Like other instincts, it may
assume a selfish, mercenary, or brutal character. But in itself, it
appears to me the most social and least selfish of all our instincts. It
fits us to give, even while receiving, pleasure; and, among cultivated
beings, the former power is ever more highly valued than the latter. Not
one of our instincts, perhaps, affords larger scope for the exercise of
disinterestedness, or fitter play for the best moral feelings of our
race. Not one gives birth to relations more gentle, more humanizing and
endearing; not one lies more immediately at the root of the kindliest
charities and most generous impulses that honor and bless human nature.
Its very power, indeed, gives fatal force to its aberrations; even as
the waters of the calmest river, when dammed up or forced from their
bed, flood and ruin the country: but the gentle flow and fertilizing
influence of the stream are the fit emblems of the instinct, when
suffered, undisturbed by force or passion, to follow its own quiet
channel.
That such an instinct should be thought and spoken of as a low, selfish
propensity, and, as such, that the discussion of its nature and
consequences should be almost interdicted in what is called decent
society, is to me a proof of the profligacy of the age, and the impurity
of the pseudo-civilized mind. I imagine that if all men and women were
gluttons and drunkards, they would, in like manner, be ashamed to speak
of diet or of temperance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account