Owen's Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population QuestionOwen, Robert Dale
Philosophy
Owen's Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population Question
Owen, Robert Dale
Birth control; Malthusianism
Besides, though it be undeniable that iniquitous laws and a vicious
order of things often produce the result that is falsely attributed to
overpopulation, it is yet equally undeniable, that the most perfect
system of laws in the world could not _ultimately_ prevent the evils of
a superabundant population. And it is no less certain, that, in the
meantime, the pressure of a large family on the labouring man greatly
augments the evil, and often deprives him of that very leisure which he
might employ in devising constitutional means to better his condition,
instead of leaving public business in the hands of political gamblers.
Thus an answer to the population question is offered as an _alleviation_
of existing evils, not as a _cure_ for them. Population might be but
half what it is, and unjust legislation and vicious customs would still
give birth, as they now do, to luxury and want. The laws and customs
ought to be, _must_ be changed; but while the grass is growing, let us
prevent the horse from starving, if we can.
Enough has been said, probably, in this chapter, to determine the
question, whether it is, or is not, _desirable_, in a political point of
view, that some check to population be sought and disclosed—some “moral
restraint” that shall not, like vice and misery, be demoralizing, nor,
like late marriages, be ascetic and impracticable.
CHAPTER V.
THE QUESTION CONSIDERED IN ITS SOCIAL BEARINGS.
This is by far the most important branch of the question. The evils
caused by an overstocking of the world, if even inevitable, are distant;
and an abstract view of the subject, however unanswerable, does not come
home to the mind with the force of detailed reality.
What would be the probable effect, in social life, if mankind obtained
and exercised a control over the instinct of reproduction?
My settled conviction is—and I am prepared to defend it—that the effect
would be salutary, moral, civilizing; that it would prevent many crimes
and more unhappiness; that it would lessen intemperance and profligacy;
that it would polish the manners and improve the moral feelings; that it
would relieve the burden of the poor, and the cares of the rich; that it
would most essentially benefit the rising generation, by enabling
parents generally more careful to educate, and more comfortable to
provide for, their offspring. I proceed to substantiate as I may these
positions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account