Owen's Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population QuestionOwen, Robert Dale
Philosophy
Owen's Moral Physiology; or, A Brief and Plain Treatise on the Population Question
Owen, Robert Dale
Birth control; Malthusianism
The same laws which regulate the perfection of plants, the growth of
corn, the fleetness of the greyhound, and the symmetry of the horse,
govern the physical and mental culture of man. In the vegetable kingdom,
the agriculturalist is aware that the success of his crops depends upon
the condition of what he sows, and the fertility of the soil wherein it
is sown. It is precisely the case with the propagation of the human
species. The race may be improved, or deteriorated, accordingly as the
laws which govern the continuance of mankind are more or less observed.
But we are digressing from the subject of which we intended to
speak—that of the transmission of diseases from parent to child. Parents
exercise a mighty influence over the physical condition of their
offspring,—the general constitution, mental and physical qualities, and
even individual peculiarities, being transmitted from sire to son.
Premature marriage, and, consequently too early sexual congress,
although it may not prove detrimental to the parents, except where its
privileges are intemperately exercised, may be, and often is a great
disadvantage to the children, they being generally delicate, imperfect,
and seldom arriving at maturity. The same results follow, where the
parents, or either of them are at the moment of conception in
ill-health. And shall the circumstances of early marriage, or a bad
state of health, debar the sexes from the satisfaction of the holiest
and most ennobling of the passions? Would it not be far more just and
moral, then, to make use of a preventive of conception, when from
motives of economy, offspring is not desired, or, from the reasons
mentioned above, health cannot be given at the same time that life is
imparted? The candid reader will have but one answer.
Physicians, generally, when referring to the subject of the transmission
of disease, lay it down as a law, that persons so affected should not
marry. Here we beg leave to differ from them, and, we think, justly.
Consumptive or scrofulous persons certainly should not beget offspring;
but we cannot see why they should be prevented from enjoying the
pleasures of the married state. It is necessary for the general health
of an individual, that the sexual embrace should be occasionally
enjoyed—indeed it is an established fact, that many of those women who
die unmarried, owe their early death, to a species of consumption,
excited by deprivation of the sexual act. We think therefore, that all
ought to be married, and that those who cannot produce healthy progeny,
should make use of means to prevent conception.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account