Oxford (England) -- History; University of Oxford -- History
In this daily round, so far as one has been able to reconstruct it, the
absence of any provision for physical recreation is a noticeable thing
to us, who have exchanged the mediæval enthusiasm for learning for an
enthusiasm for athletics. Both are excellent things in their way, but as
the governor of an American State remarked when defending the practice
of smoking over wine, both together are better than either separate. And
nowadays in some cases the combination is happily attained. But in an
age which inherited the monkish tradition of the vileness of the body
and the need of mortifying it, games of all sorts were regarded as a
weakness of the flesh. So far were founders from making any provision
for recreation, that they usually went out of their way to prohibit it.
Games with bat and ball, and tennis, that is, or fives, were strictly
forbidden as indecent, though in some cases students were permitted to
play with a soft ball in the college courts. But "deambulation in the
College Grove" was the monastic ideal. Nor did the founders frown only
on exercise; amusements of the most harmless sort were also under their
ban. On the long, cold, dark winter evenings the students were naturally
tempted to linger in the hall after supper, to gather round the fire, if
there was one, in the middle of the room, beneath the louvre, to tell
tales there and sing carols, to read poems, chronicles of the realm or
wonders of the world. But it was only on the eve of a festival that
William of Wykeham would allow this relaxation in his foundation. The
members of Trinity College were allowed to play cards in hall on
holidays only, "but on no account for money." Mummers, the chief source
of amusement among the mediævals, were only permitted to enter New
College once a year, on Twelfth Night. It was not till the dawn of the
Renaissance that plays began to be acted in the colleges and halls, and
to bring the academic intellect into touch with the views and literature
of the people.
Not only was it forbidden to play marbles on the college steps, but even
the hard exercise of chess was prohibited as a "noxious, inordinate and
unhonest game." And the keeping of dogs and hawks was anathema.
By a survival of this mediæval view, the undergraduate is still solemnly
warned by the statute book against playing any game which may cause
injury to others; he is urged to refrain from hunting wild beasts with
ferrets, nets or hounds, from hawking, "necnon ab omni apparatu et
gestatione bombardarum et arcubalistarum." In the same way he is
forbidden still to carry arms of any sort by day or night, unless it be
bows and arrows for purposes of honest amusement. But to these
injunctions, I fear, as to the accompanying threat of punishment at the
discretion of the Vice-Chancellor, he does not pay over much attention.
He does not consider them very seriously when he plays football or hunts
with the "Bicester," takes a day's shooting or runs with the Christ
Church beagles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account