Oxford (England) -- History; University of Oxford -- History
[4] The manor took its name from a well that lay to the north side
of the Church of S. Cross. The manor-house, itself (near the racquet
courts) was recently used as a public-house, called the Cock-pit,
because there was a pit where the citizens of Oxford fought their
mains. It was afterwards converted into a Penitentiary, a home for
fallen women. Traces of the Holy Well have recently been discovered
beneath the new chapel.
[5] The wall is clearly traceable between 57 and 58 High Street. The
passage by No. 57 is a piece of the old Royal Way under the walls.
This way can be traced in King's Street from its western edge to the
gardens of the small houses facing the New Examination Schools. It
occurs again in Ship Street, from Jesus College stables to the rear of
the houses facing them, and again between the Divinity School and the
west front of the Theatre. (See Hurst, "Topography.")
[6] The crypt, which had been beneath the apse of the chapel, was
afterwards replaced approximately in its position, north-east of
the tower. The capitals of the four dwarf pillars which support the
groining are interesting, and should be compared and contrasted with
those in S. Peter's in the East.
[7] The original crypt is preserved and a Norman arcade, east of the
north aisle.
[8] Aldrich was a man of remarkable and versatile talents. The author
of admirable hand-books on logic, heraldry and architecture, he was
equally skilled in chemistry and theology. In music he earned both
popularity and the admiration of musicians by his catches, services
and anthems; and as an architect he has left his mark on Oxford, in
Peckwater Quadrangle (Ch. Ch.) and All Saint's Church. As a man of
sense he loved his pipe, and wrote an amusing catch to tobacco; as a
wit he gave five good reasons for not abstaining from wine:
"A friend, good wine, because you're dry
Because you may be, by and bye;--
Or any other reason why."
It was under Aldrich that the Battle of the Books arose, the great
literary controversy, which began with the immature work of a Christ
Church student and ended with the masterpieces of Swift and Bentley.
[9] It was probably built for him. Some of the original Tudor work
remains, but the greater part of the visible portions are rough
Jacobean imitation, of the year 1628.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account