Oxford and the Rhodes ScholarshipsScholz, R. F. (Richard Frederick)
History
Oxford and the Rhodes Scholarships
Scholz, R. F. (Richard Frederick)
Rhodes scholarships
The Scholarship will be paid quarterly. The first payment (£75) will be
made in the course of the first week of the Michaelmas Term (October). No
request for any earlier payment can be considered.
After a Scholar has been once accepted by a College he should conduct
all further correspondence as to residence, studies, &c., directly with
the College in question.[43] A Scholar must arrive in Oxford not later
than the day on which his College assembles; and it will in most cases be
advantageous to arrive a few days earlier.
PART II
CHAPTER V
OXFORD AS IT IS
OR AS IT HAS SEEMED TO A RHODES SCHOLAR
[Sidenote: Difficulty of describing Oxford.]
What manner of place is Oxford? Every one knows Oxford; and yet, how
little is Oxford understood—even by those who enjoy a period of residence
within its gates! Tourists come for a day or a week, ask numerous
questions, consult a guide or a book, see a few buildings and a picture
postcard, and are ready to tell ‘all about Oxford’. Yet the longer one
stays in Oxford the more one hesitates to attempt description.
The University has its ‘Statutes’, its ‘Handbook’, its ‘Calendar’, its
‘Examination Statutes’, its ‘Programmes’ and ‘Lecture Lists’, which
contain the official information which an American inquirer expects to
find in his University ‘Catalogues’, ‘Bulletins’, and ‘College Annuals’.
Then there are numberless books which deal with various phases of Oxford
life, some of them serious, some merely impressionist sketches. But no
one book professes to give a really comprehensive description of Oxford
or to touch on all its phases; few persons have time or opportunity or
inclination to read all; and still fewer, after reading of Oxford or
living in Oxford, or doing both, agree in their impressions of what
Oxford _really_ is.
Oxford changes slowly, very slowly—and yet what one writes of Oxford
to-day may seem inaccurate to his readers to-morrow; Oxford mills grind
exceeding fine, yet what one person thinks wheat may seem to another
chaff. It depends on the point of view. This is where the difficulty
lies, and herein one feels his presumption when trying to make Oxford
real and comprehensible to the uninitiated.
[Sidenote: Two ideas: the abstract and the concrete.]
Really ‘Oxford’ means two things—it is the name of a place, and it
represents an idea. Bonaparte said of himself that he was ‘not a man but
an event’, and yet he was both. The word ‘Napoleon’ represents to us
a _man_ and an _idea_. The difficulty is to differentiate, to say how
far the concrete and the abstract may be separated, and how far each
is necessary to the proper understanding of the other. The technical
purpose for which these chapters are intended suggests that this attempt
to outline certain salient features of Oxford custom and practice shall
be limited to the concrete, avoiding as far as possible the ideal side,
especially where bordering on the lines of controversy.
[Sidenote: Oxford. Unique character.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account