Palace and Mosque at Ukhaidir: A Study in Early Mohammadan ArchitectureBell, Gertrude Lowthian
History
Palace and Mosque at Ukhaidir: A Study in Early Mohammadan Architecture
Bell, Gertrude Lowthian
Iraq -- Antiquities; Mosques; Ukheidar
[48] In the palace of Firûzâbâd the dome is of stone, but at Sarvistân
it is of brick. The construction of the squinches at Chehâr Qapû is
not like that of the Firûzâbâd squinches, but it is exactly similar to
the Sarvistân work. Dieulafoy, _L’Art antique de la Perse_, vol. iv,
Plates 5 and 14. Sarvistân is much nearer in date to Chehâr Qapû, see
below, p. 92.
[49] Ibn Ḥanbal, Musnad III, 163, quoted by Lammens, ‘La Bâdia et
la Ḥîra sous les Omaiyades,’ _Mélanges de la Faculté orientale de
Beyrouth_, vol. iv, p. 95.
[50] Lammens, op. cit., p. 92. In this brilliant article, and in
a series of studies on the Umayyad khalifs, published in the same
journal, Lammens has restored to the Umayyad period, which was
neglected or wilfully misrepresented by Mohammadan historians, its
capital importance. See too Musil, _Qṣeir ‘Amra_, p. 150 et seq.
[51] Lammens, op. cit., p. 106. Sir Charles Lyall me the following
note: ‘I feel considerable doubt as to Lammens’s theory that the word
‘ḥîrah’ was used in the time of the Umayyads. The word is Syriac, not
Arabic. See Nöldeke, _Sassaniden_, p. 25, note 1.’
[52] Ed. Wright, p. 46. See too John of Ephesus, iii, 42, where
al-Mundhir’s sons are described as pitching a great ḥertâ in the
desert.
[53] Nöldeke, _Die ghassanischen Fürsten aus dem Hause Gafna’s_, p. 47.
[54] Possibly at Djâbiyah. Teano; _Annali dell’ Islam_, vol. iii, p.
928.
[55] De Vogüé, _La Syrie centrale_, vol. i, p. 69; Bell, _The Desert
and the Sown_, p. 125.
[56] De Vogüé, op. cit., vol. i, p. 71.
[57] Dussaud, _Mission dans les régions désertiques de la Syrie
moyenne_, p. 31.
[58] Bruno, Meissner, ‘Von Babylon nach den Ruinen von Ḥîra und
Huarnaq,’ _Sendschriften der deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft_, No. 2, p.
18.
[59] Le Strange, _Lands of the Eastern Khalifate_, p. 76, n. 1.
[60] Ṭabari, ed. de Goeje, Prima Series, p. 853, Bell. _Amurath to
Amurath_, p. 141
[61] Nöldeke, _Perser und Araber_, p. 79.
[62] Rothstein, _Die Dynastie der Lakhmiden in al-Ḥîra_, p. 15. Ṭabari
does not mention this fact, though he quotes a poem by ‘Abd al-’Uzza
in which Sinimmâr is alluded to as ‘al-’ildj’, the stranger, non-Arab.
_Ṭabari_, vol. i, p. 852.
[63] Yâqût, vol. ii, p. 375.
[64] Rothstein, op. cit., p. 115. See Massignon, _Mission en
Mésopotamie_, vol. i, pp. 32 et seq., for Lakhmid topography. Sir
Charles Lyall calls my attention to a verse of al-Aswad ibn Ya’fur
in which he gives a list of the Lakhmid buildings: al-Khawarnaq,
al-Sadîr, Tzâriq, and ‘the pinnacled castle of Sindâd’.
[65] _Encyclopédie de l’Islam_, under Anbâr. The site was ancient.
[66] _Reisebeschreibung_, vol. ii, p. 236.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account