Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Third General Meeting of the American Library Association: Held at Waukesha, Wisconsin, July 4-10, 1901
Science
Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Third General Meeting of the American Library Association: Held at Waukesha, Wisconsin, July 4-10, 1901
American Library Association; Library science -- Congresses
4. Admitting that there may be cases in which it is practically
impossible to furnish title and contents with the completing number of
a volume, we would recommend for such cases that such a separate
section as has been described be made and furnished with the first
number of the new volume, stitched in _at its end_, not at its
beginning. The last-named practice is likely to cause more trouble to
librarians than any other that is common, as it is difficult to remove
the section without making the number unfit to place in the reading
room.
We would like to call the attention of periodical publishers to the
difficulties arising from the common practice of printing some first or
last leaves of reading matter on the same section with some pages of
advertising. Most librarians prefer to remove the advertising leaves
before binding the magazines. The practice referred to makes it
necessary to bind in some advertising leaves or else take off and paste
in single leaves of reading matter, sometimes three or four in one
place, which is very inimical to good binding. Publishers are advised
to have all advertising pages printed on separate sections if possible.
Desiring to meet, so far as possible, the views of publishers in regard
to the matters referred to above, the committee will be pleased to hear
from any to whom this note may come.
Mr. FLETCHER: The committee have corresponded with some of the magazine
publishers, and if any are disposed to consider what is here proposed an
ideal system, your attention may be called to the fact that several of
our magazine publishers are carrying it out. For instance, Houghton,
Mifflin & Co.--I am not mentioning them as superior to others; others
might be mentioned--but in their reply to a tentative letter Houghton,
Mifflin & Co. say that "in all of our publications every one of these
recommendations is strictly carried out." They took pride in replying to
us that they believed they were doing exactly what we wanted--and
several other publishers.
G. M. JONES: I understand the report to recommend that title-pages and
indexes be fastened into the last number of the volume. Now it seems
that in many cases it would be very much better to have them left loose.
The case is this: In almost all public libraries of any size periodicals
are put into some kind of a binder. On many accounts binders which
perforate are the best, but we do not wish to perforate title-page and
index, if we can help it, especially the title-page, and I would like to
inquire why the committee considered it so essential that the title-page
and index should be fastened into the number?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account