Parents and childrenMason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Philosophy
Parents and children
Mason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Child rearing; Education -- Parent participation
“Your question, Mrs. Tremlow, suggests further ground we must cover: a
few set rules will be of little service; we must know how much there is
in ‘human nature,’ and how to play upon it as a musician on the keys
of his instrument. We must add to our physiology, psychology, and, to
psychology, moral science. Complex, yet most simple, manifold, yet one,
human nature is not to be ticked off in a lecture or two as a subject
we have exhausted; but there is no conceivable study which yields such
splendid increase for our pains.”
“And the spiritual life of the child? Does either of these ‘ologies’
embrace the higher life, or is it not susceptible of culture?”
“Ah, there we have new conditions--the impact of the Divine upon the
human, which generates _life_, ‘without which there is no living.’ The
life is there, imparted and sustained from above; but we have something
to do here also. Spirit, like body, thrives upon daily bread and daily
labour, and it is our part to set before the child those ‘new thoughts
of God, new hopes of Heaven,’ which should be his spiritual diet;
and to practise him in the spiritual labours of prayer, praise, and
endeavour. How?--is another question for our Society to work out.”
CHAPTER XII
_A HUNDRED YEARS AFTER_
(AT THE CLOUGHS’ DINNER-TABLE, SEPT. 10, 1990.)
“It’s a capital idea! the thing ought to be commemorated. At any rate,
we can give a little dinner in honour of it. Whom shall we have?”
“Dr. and Mrs. Oldcastle, and Harry’s form-master, young Mr. Hilyard,
and his wife, will represent school-work; _we_ shall stand for parents
in general; and with Dr. and Mrs. Brenton for our medical advisers, and
the Dean and Mrs. Priestly to witness for things spiritual, we shall be
quite a ‘representative gathering.’ Will my list do?”
“Famously! Couldn’t be better. We all know the subject and each other.
I shouldn’t wonder if we have some good things said.”
Mr. Clough was a City merchant, as had been his fathers before him for
four or five generations; he was reputed wealthy, and was a rich man,
but one who held his wealth as a public trust, reserving for personal
uses only what should keep his family in refined and comfortable
living. Not that there was much virtue in this, for he, and others like
him, held in aversion luxurious living, and whatever savoured of the
“barbarous opulence” of earlier days. Dr. Oldcastle was the head-master
of an old-established foundation school; for the remaining guests they
have been sufficiently introduced by Mrs. Clough.
During the dinner there was the usual gay talk, and some light handling
of graver subjects until the ladies retired. Then--
“I wonder, gentlemen, has it occurred to you why my wife and I have
been so pertinacious in trying to get you here to-night?”
Every one’s countenance showed that he was struck by an interesting
recollection.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account