Parents and childrenMason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Philosophy
Parents and children
Mason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Child rearing; Education -- Parent participation
“Right, Mrs. Meredith! But don’t think for a moment that physiology
lends itself to the cult of muscle. Here is a youth whose _biceps_
are his better part: like most of us, he gets what he aims at--some
local renown as an athlete. But what does he pay for the whistle? His
violent ‘sports’ do not materially increase the measure of blood which
sustains him: if the muscles get more than their share, their gain
implies loss elsewhere, to the brain, commonly, and, indeed, to all
the vital organs. By-and-by, the sports of youth over, your brawny,
broad-chested young fellow collapses; is the victim of _ennui_, and
liver, lungs, or stomach send in their requisition for arrears of
nourishment fraudulently made away with.”
“But, surely, Mr. Meredith, you do not think lightly of physical
development? Why, I thought it one of the first duties of parents to
send their offspring into the world as ‘fine animals.’”
“So it is; but here, as elsewhere, there is a ‘science of the
proportion of things,’ and the young people who go in violently and
without moderation for muscular feats are a delusion and a snare: in
the end they do not prove ‘fine animals;’ they have little ‘staying’
power.”
“But a child is more than an animal; we want to know how mind and moral
feelings are to be developed?”
“Even then, Mrs. Tremlow, we should find much help in the study
of physiology--mental physiology, if you like to call it so. The
border-line where flesh and spirit meet seems to me the new field, an
Eldorado, I do believe, opened to parents and to all of us concerned
with the culture of character. I mean, the habits a child grows up with
appear to leave some sort of register in his material brain, and thus
to become part of himself in even a physical sense. Thus it rests with
parents to ease the way of their child by giving him the habits of
the good life in thought, feeling, and action, and even in spiritual
things. We cannot make a child ‘good,’ but, in this way; we can lay
paths for the good life and the moral life in the very substance of
his brain. We cannot make him hear the voice of God; but, again, we
can make paths where the Lord God may walk in the cool of the evening.
We cannot make the child clever; but we can see that his brain is
nourished with pure blood, his mind with fruitful ideas.”
“I suppose all this would be encouraging if one were up to it. But I
feel as if a great map of an unknown country were spread before me,
where the few points one wants to make for are unmarked. How, for
instance, to make a child obedient, kind, and true?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account