Parents and childrenMason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Philosophy
Parents and children
Mason, Charlotte M. (Charlotte Maria)
Child rearing; Education -- Parent participation
Some parents may consider all this as heavy hearing; that even to
“think on these things” is enough to take the joy and spontaneousness
out of their sweet relationship; and that, after all, parents’ love and
the grace of God should be sufficient for the bringing up of children.
No one can feel on this subject more sincere humility than those who
have not the honour to be parents; the insight and love with which
parents--mothers most so--are blest, is a divine gift which fills
lookers-on with reverence, even in many a cottage home; but we have
only to observe how many fond parents make foolish children to be
assured that something more is wanted. There are appointed ways, not
always the old paths, but new ones, opened up step by step as we go.
The labour of the mother who sets herself to understand her work is not
increased, but infinitely lightened; and as for life being made heavy
with the thought of these things, once make them our own, and we act
upon them as naturally as upon such knowledge--scientific also--as,
loose your hold of a cup--and it falls. A little painstaking thought
and effort in the first place, and all comes easy.
CHAPTER X
_BIBLE LESSONS_
“The history of England is now reduced to a game at cards,--the
problems of mathematics to puzzles and riddles.... There wants
but one step further, and the Creed and Ten Commandments may
be taught in the same manner, without the necessity of the
grave face, deliberate tone of recital, and devout attention
hitherto exacted from the well-governed childhood of this
realm.”--_Waverley._
That parents should make over the religious education of their children
to a Sunday-school is, no doubt, as indefensible as if they sent them
for their meals to a table maintained by the public bounty. We “at
home” plead “not guilty” to this particular count. Our Sunday-schools
are used by those toil-worn and little-learned parents who are willing
to accept at the hands of the more leisured classes this service of the
religious teaching of their children. That is, the Sunday-school is,
at present, a necessary evil, an acknowledgment that there are parents
so hard pressed that they are unable for their first duty. Here we
have the theory of the Sunday-school--the parents who can, teach their
children at home on Sunday, and substitutes step in to act for those
who can not. It is upon this delightful theory of the Sunday-school
that a clergyman[7] at the Antipodes has taken action. Never does
it appear to occur to him that the members of the upper and middle
classes do not need to be definitely and regularly instructed in
religion--“from a child.” His contention is, only, that such children
should not be taught at Sunday-school, but at home, and by their
parents; and the main object of his parochial “Parents’ Union” is to
help parents in this work. These are some of the rules:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account