Paris under the Commune: The Seventy-Three Days of the Second Siege; with Numerous Illustrations, Sketches Taken on the Spot, and Portraits (from the Original Photographs)Leighton, John
History
Paris under the Commune: The Seventy-Three Days of the Second Siege; with Numerous Illustrations, Sketches Taken on the Spot, and Portraits (from the Original Photographs)
Leighton, John
Paris (France) -- History -- Commune, 1871
recognised? He says himself that his predecessor was wrong to have
stayed in so absurd a position, and why did he voluntarily put himself
there, where he blamed another for remaining? If the new delegate hoped
by his own cleverness to modify the position, he ought not, the
position remaining the same, accuse anything but his own incapacity. In
a word, the conclusion at which we arrive is, that he only accepted
power to be able to throw it off with effect, like Cato, who only went
to the public theatres for the purpose of fussily leaving the place, at
the moment when the audience called the actors before the curtain. Not
being able or perhaps willing to save the Commune, M. Rossel desired to
save himself at its expense. There is something ungentlemanly in this.
Do not, however, imagine for a moment that I believe in M. Rossel
having been bought by M. Thiers. All those ridiculous stories of sums
of money having been offered to the members of the Commune, are merely
absurd inventions.[84] What do you think they say of Cluseret? That he
was in the habit of taking his breakfast at the Café d’Orsay, and
afterwards playing a game of dominoes. One day his adversary is
reported to have said to him, “If you will deliver the fort of
Montrouge to the Versaillais, I will give you two millions.” What fools
people must be to believe such absurdities! Rossel has not sold
himself, for the very good reason that nobody ever thought of buying
him. It was his own idea to do what he did. For the pleasure of being
insolent and showing his boldness, he has pulled down from its pedestal
what he adored, consequently the most criminal among the members of the
Commune, once a swindler, now a pilferer, is free to say to M. Rossel,
who is, I am told, a man of intelligence and honesty, “You are worse
than I am, for you have betrayed us!”
NOTES:
[81] PARIS AT DINNER.—An ogress, gentleman! A famished creature,
faring sumptuously; her face flushed with wine, her eyes bright, her
hands trembling. Madame Lutetia is a strapping woman still, with a
queenly air about her, in spite of the red patches on her tunic;
somewhat shorn of her ornaments, it is true, as she has had to pawn
the greater part of her jewelry, but the orgie once over she will be
again what she was before.
For the time being she is wholly absorbed in her gastronomic
exertions. She has already devoured a Bergeret with peas, a Lullier
with anchovy sauce, an Assy and potatoes, a Cluseret with tomatos,
a Rossel with capers, besides a large quantity of small fry, and
she is not yet appeased. The _maître-d’hôtel_ Delescluze waits upon
her somewhat in trepidation, with a sickly smile on his face. What
if, after such a meal of generals and colonels, the ogress were to
devour the waiter!—_Fac simile of design from the “Grelot,” 17th
May, 1871_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account