this testimony, balanced not against numbers merely, but numbers along with the intellect, culture, and character of those who have believed in, derived their soul's good from, and perilled their soul's existence upon, Christ's divinity?[A] [Footnote A: Mr Greg in his Essays, which at first appeared in the _Edinburgh Review_, admits this alternative. His language is, "To a philosophic inquirer there will appeal little doubt that Trinitarianism and idolatry--the _worship of Christ as God_, the worship of saints, the worship of the golden calf, have one common origin, the weakness of human imagination and the unspirituality of human intellect."--Vol. i., p. 61. Mr Greg also says, in a note to the above--"To accept the orthodox view of the Christian Revelation," (i.e., Christ's divinity,) "is to our apprehension to deny the divine origin of the Jewish religion." But was not "the view" of Jesus himself and His apostles the "orthodox" one? And did _they_ deny the divine origin of the Jewish religion? Who is right--Mr Greg or----?] Consider also, as I have suggested, the _effect_ produced by such a faith when real upon the religious ideas _regarding God_ of all who really hold it. On the supposition, for example, that the Christian's faith in Jesus is vain--that he is worshipping, loving, serving a creature, or a mere creation of his own mind, instead of the _only_ living and _true God_,--how can we account for the actual results of a faith so false and blasphemous upon his ideas regarding God?