station, nearer the Minimes than the summit of the Puy, ‘and they
found the mercury to stand at the height of 25 inches—a result with
which the party was greatly pleased,’ as indicating the relation
between the height of the mercury and the height of the station.
Upon reaching the Minimes, they found that the mercury had not
changed its height, notwithstanding the inconstancy of the weather,
which had been alternately clear, windy, rainy, and foggy. M. Périer
repeated the experiments with both the glass tubes, and found the
height of the mercury to be still 26 inches 3½ lines. On the
following morning M. de la Marc, priest of the Oratory, to whom M.
Périer had mentioned the preceding results, proposed to have the
experiment repeated at the top and bottom of the towers of Notre Dame
in Clermont. He accordingly yielded to his request, and found the
difference to be 2 lines. Upon comparing these observations, M.
Périer obtained the following results, showing the changes in the
altitude of the mercurial column corresponding to certain differences
of altitude of position:—
Difference of altitude. Changes in the height of the mercury.
Toises. Lines.
500 37½
150 15½
27 2½
7 ½
When Pascal received these results, all the difficulties were
removed; and perceiving from the two last observations in the
preceding table that 20 toises, or about 120 feet, produce a change
of 2 lines, and 7 toises, or 42 feet, a change of ½ a line, he made
the observation at the top and bottom of the tower of St Jacques de
la Boucherie, which was about 24 or 25 toises, or about 150 feet
high, and he found a difference of more than 2 lines in the mercurial
column; and in a private house 90 steps high he found a difference of
½ a line. . . . After this important experiment was made, Pascal
intimated to M. Périer that different states of the weather would
occasion differences in the barometer, according as it was cold, hot,
dry, or moist; and in order to put this opinion to the test of
experiment, M. Périer instituted a series of observations, which he
continued from the beginning of 1649 till March 1651. Corresponding
observations were made at the same time at Paris and at Stockholm by
the French ambassador, M. Chanut, and Descartes; and from these it
appeared that the mercury rises in weather which is cold, cloudy, and
damp, and falls when the weather is hot and dry, and during rain and
snow, but still with such irregularities that no general rule could
be established. At Clermont the difference between the highest and
the lowest state of the mercury was 1 inch 3½ lines; at Paris the
same; and at Stockholm 2 inches 2½ lines.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account