Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical historySchweitzer, Albert
Religion
Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical history
Schweitzer, Albert
Bible. Epistles of Paul -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. -- History; Paul, the Apostle, Saint
This theory of historical exegesis is carried out in dealing with the
great Pauline Epistles. Semler points the way to the critical
investigation of the Apostle’s thought. He gives paraphrases of the
Epistle to the Romans and the Epistles to the Corinthians, and
attempts to make clear the content and the connection of thought by a
paraphrastic and expanded rendering of each individual verse._(_10_)_
Exegesis is no longer to be encumbered with a panoply of erudition; it
is no longer to be interpenetrated with homiletic and dogmatic
considerations, and to defer to the authority of the old Greek
expositors, who, “when it is a question of historical arguments, had
no better or clearer knowledge than we have ourselves.” It must let
the Scriptural [pg 006] phrases say openly and freely what they mean
in their literal sense, and devote itself simply to that
dispassionate, objective study of facts which has hitherto been too
much neglected.
The importance of the paraphrases does not however consist, as might
be supposed, in their exhibiting the distinctive character of the
Pauline trains of thought in comparison with the views of the other
New Testament writers. By his use of a paraphrastic rendering of the
text Semler puts an obstacle in the way of his gaining an insight into
the specifically Pauline reasoning, and unconsciously imports his own
logic into the Apostle’s arguments.
On the other hand, his brilliant powers of observation enable him to
call attention to some fundamental problems of literary criticism. He
is the first to point out that we do not possess the Pauline Epistles
in their original form, but only in the form in which they were read
in the churches. The canonical Epistle is therefore not, as a matter
of _a priori_ certainty, identical with the historical letter. It is
quite possible, he argues, that the letters as read in the churches
were produced by joining together, or working up together, different
letters, and also that written directions and messages, which
originally existed in a separate form, were attached in later copies
to the Epistles in order that no part of the heritage left by the
Apostle might be lost.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account