From the German literature we may cite G. Heinrici, _Die Forschungen über die paulinischen Briefe: ihr gegenwärtiger Stand und ihre Aufgaben_ (“The Study of the Pauline Letters; its present Position, and Task”). Lectures given before the theological conference at Giessen, 1886, pp. 69-120. Wilhelm Brückner, _Die chronologische Reihenfolge, in welcher die Briefe des Neuen Testaments verfasst sind_ (“The Chronological Order in which the Epistles of the New Testament were written”), 1890, 306 pp. (An essay which received the prize offered for the treatment of this question by the Teylerian Society of Haarlem.) “On the Chronological Order of the Four main Epistles, pp. 174-203. Carl Clemen, _Die Chronologie der paulinischen Briefe,_ 1893, 292 pp. By the same writer, _Die Einheitlichkeit der paulinischen Briefe_ (“The Integrity of the Pauline Epistles”), 1894, 183 pp. In these writings Clemen makes some concessions to the Ultra-Tübingen critics. Thus, for example, he is prepared to put Galatians after Romans and Corinthians. The mediating views here offered, though sometimes interesting, need nevertheless no longer occupy us, as Clemen has in the meantime completely recovered his confidence and has contradicted himself. In the first volume of his _Paulus_ (1904, 416 pp., examination of the sources) he pronounces that the four main epistles are to be regarded as entirely genuine, if only we may divide the second Epistle to the Corinthians into four. In addition to I Thessalonians and Philippians, even Colossians and 2 Thessalonians are to be regarded as from the Apostle’s pen. In the preface the author begs that he may not be held accountable for his views prior to his Damascus. The second volume of the work, _Paulus. Sein Leben und Werken,_ 1904, 339 pp., is in biographical form, and does not enter further into the problems of the doctrine. A writer who takes the “Ultra-Tübingen” side is J. Friedrich (Maehliss). In his work entitled _Die Unechtheit des Galaterbriefs_ (“The Spuriousness of Galatians”), 1891, 67 pp., he defends both the rights of radical criticism and of a “simplified orthography.” 104 See p. 128, _sup_. 105 See p. 128, _sup_. 106 See p. 129, _sup_. 107 See pp. 114 and 115 of the work cited above, p. 134. 108 Christian Hermann Weisse, _Philosophische Dogmatik oder Philosophie des Christentums,_ 3 vols., 1855, 60, 62; vol. i., 712 pp. On the Pauline Epistles, pp. 144-147. 109 On Romans see also vol. iii. of the _Philosophische Dogmatik_ (1862, 736 pp.), pp. 263, 264. The Epistle to the Ephesians, the Second to the Corinthians, and the First to Timothy, Weisse holds to be “entirely unapostolic”; in the Epistle to Titus and the Second to Timothy he is prepared to recognise as a possibility the genuineness of the personal notices. 110 In 2 Corinthians, which shows no evidence of interpolation, three different letters to this church are worked up together.