Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical historySchweitzer, Albert
Religion
Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical history
Schweitzer, Albert
Bible. Epistles of Paul -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. -- History; Paul, the Apostle, Saint
111 Christian Hermann Weisse, _Beiträge zur Kritik der paulinischen
Briefe an die Galater, Römer, Philipper und Kolosser_ (“Contributions
to the Criticism of the Pauline Epistles to the Galatians, Romans,
Philippians, and Colossians”). Edited by E. Sulze, 1867, 65 pp. By way
of introduction the pupil prefixes an essay on the principles of his
master’s “stylistic criticism.”
In the reconstructed texts it is apparent that the author had spent on
them, as he says in his Dogmatic, the “diligent work of many years.”
It is a piece of really skilled workmanship.
112 Daniel Völter, _Die Entstehung der Apokalypse,_ 1882, 72 pp. _Die
Komposition der paulinischen Hauptbriefe,_ 1890, 174 pp. The Epistles
examined are those to the Romans and Galatians. _Paulus und seine
Briefe. Kritische Untersuchungen zu einer neuen Grundlegung der
paulinischen Briefliteratur und ihrer Theologie,_ 1905, 331 pp. Here
he deals with Corinthians, Romans, Galatians, and Philippians. The
results arrived at in the previous book are, as a rule, taken over.
Völter rejects the genuineness of 1 Thessalonians, and sees in the
letters to the Colossians and Ephesians, and in the Pastorals, new
“phases in the development” of Paulinism.
113 In its original form it consisted, Völter thinks, of the following
sections: i. I, 5b-7, 8-17; v. I-12, 15-19, 21; vi. I-13, 6:16-23;
chapters xii. and xiii.; xiv. I-xv. 6; xv. 14-16, 23b-33, xvi 21-24.
114 Völter is also able to indicate additions which have taken place
subsequently to this redaction.
The interpolations in Philippians relate, according to him, chiefly to
Christology and eschatology. The author of these additions had before
him Romans and Corinthians in their interpolated form, and was also
doubtless acquainted with Galatians.
115 The well-known German religious journal.
116 The labour of making an inventory of what has been done in this
kind of criticism up to the year 1894 was undertaken by C. Clemen in
his work, _Die Einheitlichkeit der paulinischen Briefe an der Hand der
bisher mit Bezug auf sie aufgestellten Interpolations- und
Kompilationshypothesen_ (“The Integrity of the Pauline Epistles, with
Reference to the Hypotheses of Interpolation or Compilation which have
been applied to them”), 1894, 183 pp. He takes account also of all
contributions to the journals. This gives a special value to this
laborious and unselfish work.
A survey of previous work in conjectural criticism is given by J. M.
S. Baljon in _De Tekst der Brieven van Paulus aan de Romeinen, de
Corinthiërs en de Galatiërs,_ 1884, 189 pp.
117 Friedrich Spitta, _Untersuchungen über den Brief des Paulus an die
Römer_ (“A Study of the Epistle to the Romans”), 1901, 193 pp. In the
work _Zur Geschichte und Literatur des Urchristentums,_ vol. iii. part
i.
NOTES FOR CHAPTER VI THE POSITION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE TWENTIETH
CENTURY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account