Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical history — John Shaqi
Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical historySchweitzer, Albert
Religion
Paul and his interpreters : $b A critical history
Schweitzer, Albert
Bible. Epistles of Paul -- Criticism, interpretation, etc. -- History; Paul, the Apostle, Saint
The curious thing is that Holsten, Pfleiderer, and their followers do
not venture to formulate the unwelcome admission which may be read
between their lines, but keep up the game with one another as if
everything was going as well as heart could wish. They overdo their
air of unconcern, as though from an uncomfortable sense that they
might in the end lose confidence in their assertion, and so find
themselves unable to explain how Paul arrived at his dualistic
antithesis between flesh and spirit.
For this is what it all ultimately comes to. The assertion of Greek
influence is a kind of pillared portico behind which they construct
the edifice of Paulinism as they understand it. The style, however, is
only maintained as regards the front. What lies behind that is
styleless, neither Greek nor Jewish, without plan, without character,
without proportion. Those writers who wholly or partially dissent from
the assumption of Greek influences carry out the same plan with the
same materials, and with the same unconcern as regards the style. The
only difference is that they do not conceal it by building a special
façade in front of it, whether it be that, like Harnack, they have a
fuller sense of the difficulties, or, like Weiss and Weizsäcker,
persuade themselves that Paulinism, according to their construction of
it, looks sufficiently well as it is.
There is, however, one point on which Pfleiderer and his followers
think that they can point to definite results of the influence of
Greek ideas. They maintain that the Apostle’s eschatological
expectations have been transformed by them. This has reference to the
passage in 2 Cor. v. I ff. in which Paul gives expression to his
desire not to be “unclothed” but to be “clothed upon.” The natural
interpretation which is given by Bernard Weiss and others understands
the Apostle as speaking [pg 070] of his eager desire to experience the
parousia while still alive in the body, in order to share that
transformation in which “what is mortal will be swallowed up by life,”
and not to have to pass through a time of waiting in an intermediate
state of non-being or death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account