Pausanias' description of Greece, Volume I.Pausanias, active approximately 150-175
History
Pausanias' description of Greece, Volume I.
Pausanias, active approximately 150-175
Greece -- Antiquities; Greece -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800
But the Lacedæmonians on hearing the oracle of the Messenians were
very dejected, both they and their kings, and henceforth shrank from
resuming the war. But in the sixth year after the flight of Lyciscus
from Ithome the Lacedæmonians (as their sacrifices were auspicious)
led an army to Ithome. But the Cretans chanced to be absent, and the
allies of the Messenians were also behindhand. For the Spartans were
an object of suspicion to other Peloponnesians and especially to the
Arcadians and Argives. The Argives indeed were going to come to help
the Messenians secretly without the knowledge of the Lacedæmonians,
privately rather than from public decree. But the Arcadian expedition
was publicly announced, though they were behindhand too. But the
Messenians were induced by confidence in the oracle to hazard war even
without allies. In most respects the battle was no different from the
former one, for daylight on this occasion too failed the combatants:
it is not however mentioned that either wing or division were broken,
for they say the troops did not remain in the order in which they were
placed at first, but the bravest men came from the wings in both armies
into the centre, and there was the strain of battle. For Euphaes was
more ardent in fight than one would have expected from a king, and
recklessly rushing upon Theopompus and his staff, received many mortal
wounds. As he fainted away and fell to the ground, and could scarce
breathe, the Lacedæmonians strove with might and main to drag him to
their army. But their previous goodwill to Euphaes, and their future
disgrace if they abandoned him, roused the Messenians, and it appeared
better to them to give up their lives for their king rather than
purchase safety by abandoning him. Accordingly the peril of Euphaes
prolonged the battle, and added to the bravery exhibited on both
sides, and afterwards he revived, and saw that his men were fighting
as valiantly as the foe, and not many days afterwards he died, having
been king of the Messenians for 13 years, and having been at war with
the Lacedæmonians during all his reign. And as he had no children he
left the choice of his successor to the people, and Cleonnis and Damis
were rival competitors with Aristodemus, being considered superior to
him both in other respects and in war. And Antander had been killed in
the battle jeoparding his life for Euphaes. And the opinions of the
seers, Epebolus and Ophioneus, were both similar, that the kingdom of
Æpytus and his descendants should not be conferred upon a man polluted
with the murder of a daughter. Nevertheless Aristodemus was elected
and became king. And Ophioneus the Messenian seer was blind from his
birth, and had the following mode of divination. By enquiring into a
person’s private and public fortune in the past he informed them what
it would be in the future. This was his divination, and Aristodemus
having become king through the people was desirous to gratify them in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account