Pegasus : $b problems of transportationFuller, J. F. C. (John Frederick Charles)
History
Pegasus : $b problems of transportation
Fuller, J. F. C. (John Frederick Charles)
Railroads -- History; Transportation; Trucks
In the very year James Watt built the first practical steam engine,
namely, the year 1769—the year Napoleon was born—fearful riots were
taking place in Russia, because some enlightened person had introduced
the potato, a useful vegetable as we all know, yet at this time one in
which the Russian peasant saw the Satanic thumb, for he was certain that
this humble vegetable was the “devil’s apple.” Though why this should
have detracted from its nutritive qualities I cannot say.
Looking back now, and we are nearing Brusselton, it seems to me that
there is no difference between the spirit of these deluded peasants and
those who, with shoe lasts, beat vigorously on the door of
Erichthonius’s house. They are one and all Sir Henry Herberts, though
the particular cut of their clothes may differ. George Stephenson,
having studied steam engines in general and Mr. Trevithick’s crude and
inefficient locomotive in particular, determined to build one of his
own, and, with the support of Lord Ravensworth, he accomplished this
feat at Killingworth in 1814. There the first efficient locomotive was
made. Had Lord Eldon been a Russian, he would probably have objected to
potatoes, but being an Englishman he preferred bigger game. “I am
sorry,” he said, “to find the intelligent people of the North-country
gone mad on the subject of railways.” A few miles had only been opened,
but this was quite sufficient to establish madness, and by some other of
his ilk, the adage, “A fool and his money are soon parted,” was applied
to Lord Ravensworth.
The Killingworth railway was followed by the Stockton and Darlington
line. Mr. Edward Pease, the Quaker supporter of Stephenson, had said:
“Let the country but make the railroads, and the railroads will make the
country.” Be it remembered that locomotives had been working at
Killingworth, and very efficiently, for ten years; but there were others
who, unlike Mr. Pease, were full of the spirit of old Herbert. The Duke
of Cleveland opposed the measure in Parliament, as the line would pass
through his fox covers, and, due to his influence it was thrown out. A
new survey was made, avoiding these precious earths, and the railway was
built.
The next line was that between Manchester and Liverpool. Lord Derby
turned out his farm hands to chase Stephenson’s surveyors off his
estates. Lord Sefton did likewise, and the Duke of Bridgewater
threatened to shoot them at sight. Stephenson had his theodolite so
often smashed that he deemed it wise to hire a prize fighter to carry
it. The “Quarterly Review” supported the project, and it is curious to
read what it said, for it will give the reader some idea of the
virulence of the opposition. It says:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account