H. C. Lea, _Studies in Church History_, p. 171. Philadelphia, 1869. Footnote 299: _C. Agathense_, c. 32. Footnote 300: _C. Epaonense_, c. 11. Footnote 301: The same was also referred to by the eighteenth Canon of the Council of Verneuil about 755. Footnote 302: _C. Matisconense_, i. c. 7. Footnote 303: _C. Matisconense_, i. c. 8. Footnote 304: _C. Aurelian_, iii. c. 32. Footnote 305: _C. Parisiense_, v. c. 4. Footnote 306: _Gregor. I._ lib. vi. Epis. xi. Footnote 307: Haddan and Stubbs, _Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents_, i. p. 133. _Canones Wallici_, c. 40 (37). Oxford, 1869. Footnote 308: Lea, _Studies_, p. 178. Footnote 309: Lea, _Studies_, p. 179. Footnote 310: _Ibid._ p. 182. Footnote 311: Epis. xcvii. 70. Migne, _Patrologiae_, tom. 119, p. 1006. Footnote 312: _C. Ravennense_, c. 4. Footnote 313: For instance, by Charlemagne in 789 and at the Synod of Bamberg A.D. 1491; _vide_ Lea, _Studies_, pp. 178, 192, 196. Footnote 314: _Privilegia Clericorum, Constitutio Frederici Imperitoris_, p. iii. _B. M. Cat._ i. a. 6515, _Constitutio Caroli_, 1498. Footnote 315: G. H. Pertz, _Monumenta Germaniae Legum_, tom. ii. p. 244. Hanover, 1837. Lea, _Studies_, pp. 191, 196. Footnote 316: _Ibid._ pp. 191, 192. Footnote 317: P. F. Lecourayer, _Histoire du Concile de Trente_, tom. ii. p. 658; and see p. 585, etc. 1736. Footnote 318: For post-Tridentine claims, _vide_ Lea, _Studies_, p. 216, etc. Footnote 319: Holdsworth, _Hist. Eng. Law_, iii. p. 253. Footnote 320: Even _insidiatores viarum et depopulatores agrorum_ were ultimately allowed clergy by 4 Hen. IV. c. 2, A.D. 1402. Footnote 321: Matthew Hale, _Pleas of the Crown_, ii. p. 333. London, 1800. Footnote 322: Lingard, _Hist._ ii. p. 192, etc. Footnote 323: Holdsworth, i. p. 382. Footnote 324: Lea, _Studies_, pp. 213, 218. Footnote 325: Lingard, ii. p. 127. Footnote 326: D. Rock, _The Church of Our Fathers_, i. p. 144. London, 1903. Footnote 327: J. F. Stephen, _Hist. Crim. Law_, i. p. 461. Footnote 328: A. S. Green, _Henry II._, p. 85. London, 1903. Footnote 329: Lea, _Studies_, pp. 178, 203. Footnote 330: Johnson, _Laws and Canons_, ii. p. 194. Footnote 331: 25 Ed. III. c. 4. Footnote 332: J. F. Stephen, _Hist. Crim. Law_, i. p. 461. Footnote 333: Meiklejohn, _Hist. Eng._ vol. i. p. 165. London, 1895. Footnote 334: Lord Auckland, _Principles_, p. 173. Footnote 335: Thomas Smith, _De Republica Anglorum_, Alston’s ed. p. 103. Cambridge, 1906. Footnote 336: D. Barrington, _Observations on the More Ancient Statutes_, p. 443. Footnote 337: Hale, _Pleas of the Crown_, ii. p. 372. Footnote 338: J. F. Stephen, _Hist. Crim. Law_, i. p. 460. Footnote 339: Pollock and Maitland, _Hist. Eng. Law_, i. p. 426. Footnote 340: W. Stanford, _Plees de Coron._, lib. ii. cap. 48. London, 1560. Footnote 341: