3. If the loadstone A B have so much strength, that it can
attract the bullet in F, when it is not turned round, but does
only slide upon the plane, whereas its own gravity would rowl
it downwards; then it is evident the sphere of its activity
and strength would be so increased when it approaches much
nearer, that it would not need the assistance of the plane,
but would draw it immediately to itself without that help; and
so the bullet would not fall down through the hole, but ascend
to the stone, and, consequently, cease its motion: for, if the
loadstone be of force enough to draw the bullet on the plane, at
the distance F B, then must the strength of it be sufficient to
attract it immediately unto itself, when it is so much nearer
as E B. And if the gravity of the bullet be supposed so much
to exceed the strength of the magnet, that it cannot draw it
directly when it is so near, then will it not be able to attract
the bullet up the plane, when it is so much further off.
So that none of all these magnetical experiments, which have
been as yet discovered, are sufficient for the effecting of
a perpetual motion, though these kind of qualities seem most
conducible unto it; and perhaps, hereafter, it may be contrived
from them.
CHAP. XIV.--_The seeming probability of effecting a Continual
Motion by Solid Weights in a Hollow Wheel or Sphere._
The third way whereby the making of a perpetual motion has been
attempted is by the Natural Affection of Gravity; when the
heaviness of several bodies is so contrived, that the same motion
which they give in their descent, may be able to carry them up
again.
But (against the possibility of any such invention) it is thus
objected by Cardan:--All sub-lunary bodies have a direct motion
either of ascent or descent; which, because it does not refer to
some term, therefore cannot be perpetual, but must needs cease
when it is arrived at the place unto which it naturally tends.
I answer, though this may prove that there is no natural motion
of any particular heavy body which is perpetual, yet it does not
hinder, but that it is possible from them to contrive such an
artificial revolution as shall constantly be the cause of itself.
Those bodies which may be serviceable to this purpose are
distinguishable into two kinds:
1. Solid and consistent; as weights of metal, or the like.
2. Fluid or sliding; as water, sand, etc.
Both these ways have been attempted by many, though with very
little or no success. Other men's conjectures in this kind you
may see set down by divers authors. It would be too tedious to
repeat them over, or set forth their draughts.
I shall only mention two new ones, which (if I am not
over-partial) seem altogether as probable as any of these kinds
that have been yet invented; and, till experience had discovered
their defect and insufficiency, I did certainly conclude them to
be infallible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account