The true inclination of the screw being found, together with
the certain quantity of water which every helix does contain;
it is further considerable, that the water by this instrument
does ascend naturally of itself, without any violence or labor;
and that the heaviness of it does lie chiefly upon the centers
or axis of the cylinder, both its sides being of equal weight
(said Ubaldus); so that, it should seem, though we suppose each
revolution to have an equal quantity of water, yet the screw
will remain with any part upwards, according as it shall be
set, without turning itself either way; and, therefore, the
least strength being added to either of its sides should make
it descend, according to that common maxim of Archimedes--any
addition will make that which equiponderates with another to tend
downwards.
But now, because the weight of this instrument and the water
in it does lean wholly upon the axis, hence is it (said
Ubaldus) that the grating and rubbing of these axes against the
sockets wherein they are placed, will cause some ineptitude
and resistency to that rotation of the cylinder; which would
otherwise ensue upon the addition of the least weight to any one
side; but (said the same author) any power that is greater than
this resistency which does arise from the axis, will serve for
the turning of it round.
These things considered together, it will hence appear how a
perpetual motion may seem easily contrivable. For, if there were
but such a water-wheel made on this instrument, upon which the
stream that is carried up may fall in its descent, it would turn
the screw round, and by that means convey as much water up as is
required to move it; so that the motion must needs be continual,
since the same weight which in its fall does turn the wheel is,
by the turning of the wheel, carried up again.
Or, if the water, falling upon one wheel, would not be forcible
enough for this effect, why then there might be two or three, or
more, according as the length and elevation of the instrument
will admit; by which means the weight of it may be so multiplied
in the fall that it shall be equivalent to twice or thrice that
quantity of water which ascends; as may be more plainly discerned
by the following diagram:
[Illustration]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account