from the center, while those of the ascending side rise for a
considerable part of their ascent at a less distance from the
same point, it is concluded that the wheel will continue to
maintain its motion. On this, however, it is to be remarked that
the perpendicular ascent and descent are alike, both in measure
and in time of performance; and that the familiar examination,
even to those who know little of such subjects, is sufficient
to show that the preponderance is not quite so palpable as at
first it appears. For the weights G and F, H and E, I and D
are evidently in equilibrio, because at the same horizontal
distance from the center; and if the favorable supposition that
the weight B has already run out be admitted, it will then
remain a question whether these two exterior weights, B and C,
can preponderate over the four inner weights, K L M A. The more
accurate examination of this particular contrivance will lead to
the following theorem: In two concentric circles, if tangents be
drawn at the extreme points of a diameter of the smaller, and
continued till they intersect the larger, the common center of
gravity of the arc of the greater circle included between the
tangents and of the half periphery of the smaller circle on the
opposite side of the diameter, will be the common center of the
circles. If, therefore, the balls were indefinitely numerous and
small, the supposed effective parts of the wheel (Fig. 5) would
be in equilibrio, as well as the parts beneath the horizontal
tangent of the inner circle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account