Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical EssayKant, Immanuel
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Essay
Kant, Immanuel
Peace
[126] A Greek Emperor who magnanimously volunteered to settle by
a duel his quarrel with a Bulgarian Prince, got the following
answer:—“A smith who has tongs will not pluck the glowing iron
from the fire with his hands.”
The depravity of human nature[127] shows itself without disguise
in the unrestrained relations of nations to each other, while in
the law-governed civil state much of this is hidden by the check
of government. This being so, it is astonishing that the word
“right” has not yet been entirely banished from the politics of
war as pedantic, and that no state has yet ventured to publicly
advocate this point of view. For Hugo Grotius, Puffendorf, Vattel
and others—Job’s comforters, all of them—are always quoted in good
faith to justify an attack, although their codes, whether couched
in philosophical or diplomatic terms, have not—nor can have—the
slightest legal force, because states, as such, are under no common
external authority; and there is no instance of a state having ever
been moved by argument to desist from its purpose, even when this
was backed up by the testimony of such great men. This homage which
every state renders—in words at least—to the idea of right, proves
that, although it may be slumbering, there is, notwithstanding, to
be found in man a still higher natural moral capacity by the aid of
which he will in time gain the mastery over the evil principle in his
nature, the existence of which he is unable to deny. And he hopes the
same of others; for otherwise the word “right” would never be uttered
by states who wish to wage war, unless to deride it like the Gallic
Prince who declared:—“The privilege which nature gives the strong is
that the weak must obey them.”[128]
[127] “Both sayings are very true: that _man to man is a kind of
God_; and that _man to man is an arrant wolf_. The first is true,
if we compare citizens amongst themselves; and the second, if we
compare cities. In the one, there is some analogy of similitude
with the Deity; to wit, justice and charity, the twin sisters
of peace. But in the other, good men must defend themselves by
taking to them for a sanctuary the two daughters of war, deceit
and violence: that is, in plain terms, a mere brutal rapacity.”
(Hobbes: Epistle Dedicatory to the _Philosophical Rudiments
concerning Government and Society_.) [Tr.]
[128] “The strongest are still never sufficiently strong to
ensure them the continual mastership, unless they find means of
transforming force into right, and obedience into duty.
From the right of the strongest, right takes an ironical
appearance, and is rarely established as a principle.” (_Contrat
Social_, I. Ch. III.) [Tr.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account