Personal rights : $b A presidential address delivered to the forty-first annual meeting of the Personal Rights Association on 6th June 1913Caird, Mona
Philosophy
Personal rights : $b A presidential address delivered to the forty-first annual meeting of the Personal Rights Association on 6th June 1913
Caird, Mona
Civil rights -- Great Britain
Before they have done, our philanthropic locusts will have eaten off
every green blade and leaf of human initiative, and will leave the
Society which they so yearn to serve barren and blight-stricken,
perhaps for centuries to come. Of what value to any one is such a
Society? What in fact, _exists_, but individuals?
And mark: there is no retracing our steps if we go too far in this
direction. We are always assured that there would be a reaction against
a too great restriction of the human spirit. But that is true only so
long as the restriction is more or less a novelty and is _not_ too
great. Directly it becomes really extreme, there is no reaction. We can
see this in the innumerable nations of antiquity and of today which
have remained stagnant for hundreds and hundreds of years. Lack of
human rights tends progressively to stifle the spirit that would demand
or respect them. Even in England, whose history is that of the struggle
for liberty, we have seen how, in women, that spirit has been weakened.
How then are we to hope—after a too deep descent to Avernus—for a
return towards the light and inspiration of freedom? It is expecting a
result without a cause—or rather in the teeth of one.
Like Xerxes, stupidly confident, we burn our boats behind us. Or, more
accurately, Nature burns them for us. She seems to say: “Very well;
if you don’t want to give scope to original minds, you have only to
make your social conditions accordingly—subordinate your individual
ruthlessly to what you call ‘the common good’—and original minds will
never trouble you again. Not only will your organization suppress them,
but it will gradually destroy your power even to produce them. That
will save _them_ an immensity of trouble, and prevent all hitches in
your boring routine. If that’s what you want, it is easily yours.”
But our reformers _don’t_ exactly want that. They like to have it
both ways. They want a subservient, State-ridden community of highly
individualized human beings, who—like the inmates of Barry’s Home for
Geniuses—would initiate punctually and spontaneously to order—in the
approved direction, of course. No fantastic unexpected nonsense would
be tolerated for a moment!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account